The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1134/s1028334x13010133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New data on the age (U-Pb, Sm-Nd) of garnetites from Salma eclogites of the Belomorian mobile belt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
14

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, ancient (>2.0–1.9 Ga) high‐grade metamorphic terranes rarely preserve (pristine) eclogite—examples are the Hengshan granulite complex (North China Craton, 1.9–1.8 Ga, Zhao, Cawood, Wilde, & Lu, ), the Snowbird granulite–eclogite complex (Canada, 1.9 Ga, Baldwin, Bowring, & Williams, ), the Lapland granulite complex (Russia, 1.9 Ga, Daly et al., ) and the Ubendian/Usagaran eclogite‐bearing complex (Tanzania, 2.0–1.9 Ga, Collins, Reddy, Buchan, & Mruma, ). Overall, there are three scenarios invoked for the formation and evolution of the Belomorian eclogites (see Perchuk & Morgunova, ): scenario I, a single Mesoarchean eclogite facies metamorphism (Dokukina & Konilov, ; Dokukina et al., ; Mints, Belousova, et al., ; Mints, Konilov, et al., ); scenario II, at least two eclogite facies events in the Archean and the Palaeoproterozoic (Balagansky et al., ; Slabunov, Stepanova, Bibikova, Babarina, & Matukov, ; Slabunov, Volodichev, Skublov, & Berezin, ; Volodichev, Slabunov, Sibelev, Skublov, & Kuzenko, ); and, scenario III, a single Palaeoproterozoic eclogite facies metamorphism at 1.9 Ga (Herwartz, Skublov, Berezin, & Mel'nik, ; Mel'nik, Skublov, Marin, Berezin, & Bogomolov, ; Skublov, Berezin, & Mel'nik, ; Skublov et al., ; Travin & Kozlova, ). The Shirokaya Salma eclogites have previously been considered as having a Meso‐Neoarchean age (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, ancient (>2.0–1.9 Ga) high‐grade metamorphic terranes rarely preserve (pristine) eclogite—examples are the Hengshan granulite complex (North China Craton, 1.9–1.8 Ga, Zhao, Cawood, Wilde, & Lu, ), the Snowbird granulite–eclogite complex (Canada, 1.9 Ga, Baldwin, Bowring, & Williams, ), the Lapland granulite complex (Russia, 1.9 Ga, Daly et al., ) and the Ubendian/Usagaran eclogite‐bearing complex (Tanzania, 2.0–1.9 Ga, Collins, Reddy, Buchan, & Mruma, ). Overall, there are three scenarios invoked for the formation and evolution of the Belomorian eclogites (see Perchuk & Morgunova, ): scenario I, a single Mesoarchean eclogite facies metamorphism (Dokukina & Konilov, ; Dokukina et al., ; Mints, Belousova, et al., ; Mints, Konilov, et al., ); scenario II, at least two eclogite facies events in the Archean and the Palaeoproterozoic (Balagansky et al., ; Slabunov, Stepanova, Bibikova, Babarina, & Matukov, ; Slabunov, Volodichev, Skublov, & Berezin, ; Volodichev, Slabunov, Sibelev, Skublov, & Kuzenko, ); and, scenario III, a single Palaeoproterozoic eclogite facies metamorphism at 1.9 Ga (Herwartz, Skublov, Berezin, & Mel'nik, ; Mel'nik, Skublov, Marin, Berezin, & Bogomolov, ; Skublov, Berezin, & Mel'nik, ; Skublov et al., ; Travin & Kozlova, ). The Shirokaya Salma eclogites have previously been considered as having a Meso‐Neoarchean age (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prograde metamorphism likely occurred ca. 1.92-1.88 Ga (Skublov et al, 2010a(Skublov et al, , 2011Herwartz et al, 2012;Mel'nik et al, 2013), as mentioned herein.…”
Section: P-t Path During Paleoproterozoic Metamorphismmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Garnet in the analyzed eclogite records prograde zoning, with increasing pyrope contents from core to rim (Skublov et al, 2011). Studies of Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd garnet geochronology from the same eclogite yielded garnet-whole-rock isochron ages of 1901 ± 5 Ma and 1897 ± 16 Ma, respectively (Herwartz et al, 2012;Mel'nik et al, 2013). Although these ages were interpreted to reflect the timing of peak eclogite facies metamorphism, the Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd ages of garnets with growth zoning are generally interpreted to represent prograde metamorphic ages, due to the low diffusivities of REEs (Baxter and Scherer, 2013).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Paleoproterozoic Zircon Agesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations