“…It has been recognized, for instance, that the cinchona alkaloids have many internal-rotation degrees of freedom, ,,,− but it is not yet clear how those become reduced upon adsorption and complexation with the reactant (if at all). , In fact, it is not even known if the modifier:reactant adduct mentioned before forms directly on the surface or previously in solution. Certainly, the nature of the solvent is critical, affecting not only enantioselectivity but also total activity; it would seem that better solvents for the modifier facilitate reversible adsorption, and with that improve catalytic performance. ,,− The competitive adsorption of different modifiers defines the nature of the surface modification as well, − and can even lead to enantioselectivity inversion from the preferential production of one enantiomer to the other; ,,− an early example of this type of inversion, due to changes in the bulkiness of the ether function of the modifier, is illustrated in Figure . The silanol groups of silica supports may also interact with the chiral modifier, and in some cases improve enantioselectivity .…”