2009
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2008.101501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New criteria for inflammatory back pain in patients with chronic back pain: a real patient exercise by experts from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)

Abstract: Objective: Inflammatory back pain (IBP) is an important clinical symptom in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), and relevant for classification and diagnosis. In the present report, a new approach for the development of IBP classification criteria is discussed. Methods: Rheumatologists (n = 13) who are experts in SpA took part in a 2-day international workshop to investigate 20 patients with back pain and possible SpA. Each expert documented the presence/absence of clinical parameters typical for IBP,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
309
2
52

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 529 publications
(367 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
309
2
52
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, a number of criteria have been proposed to clinically differentiate inflammatory from mechanical back pain. The Inflammatory Back Pain (IBP) Experts' Criteria are robust, easy to apply, and have been validated in the international ASAS study on new classification criteria for AxSpA [41]. Therefore, these criteria, where at least four of five of the following parameters are present: (1) age at onset no greater than 40 years; (2) insidious onset; (3) improvement with exercise; (4) no improvement with rest; and (5) pain at night (with improvement upon getting up), are recommended for defining IBP in the ASAS-endorsed recommendations for early referral [21].…”
Section: Reducing Time To Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, a number of criteria have been proposed to clinically differentiate inflammatory from mechanical back pain. The Inflammatory Back Pain (IBP) Experts' Criteria are robust, easy to apply, and have been validated in the international ASAS study on new classification criteria for AxSpA [41]. Therefore, these criteria, where at least four of five of the following parameters are present: (1) age at onset no greater than 40 years; (2) insidious onset; (3) improvement with exercise; (4) no improvement with rest; and (5) pain at night (with improvement upon getting up), are recommended for defining IBP in the ASAS-endorsed recommendations for early referral [21].…”
Section: Reducing Time To Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first part, patients completed a questionnaire about demographics (gender, age, sedentary work, sick leaves and their durations), and pain characteristics (duration since the first LBP episode, duration since pain heightening, presence of a triggering factor, associated sciatica, morning stiffness, waking at night because of LBP, maximal diurnal intensity pain period) as well as a standardized disability questionnaire validated in French [Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ)] [10]. Inflammatory criteria were defined after review from recent literature on inflammatory back pain [11,12], and from inflammatory criteria of ankylosing spondylitis [13][14][15][16][17]. An inflammatory pain pattern was defined by the presence of at least one of three characteristics: maximal pain on morning, waking at night because of pain, and morning stiffness for longer than 60 min.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise estimates of both expected agreement and effect sizes for the associations investigated were obtained with the 18 rheumatologists and 30 cases used. The number of rheumatologist evaluators and cases used also compares favorably with other studies that have investigated interrater agreement (1,43,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Rheumatologic assessments of case summaries are imperfectly correlated with the clinical management of real patients (5). Validation of these findings in the clinical setting would be ideal but poses additional logistical challenges relative to existing examples of related efforts with prevalent conditions (44). Future research on early IA should include the ERRR as a standardized adjunct to rheumatologic opinion to circumvent interstudy variability of the definition of the study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%