2004
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2004.825575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Cost-Effective VLSI Implementation of a 2-D Discrete Cosine Transform and Its Inverse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parallel-pipeline architecture and arithmetic units operating at half the frequency gives an input data rate of 300 MHz, far higher than that of the fastest processor listed in this table [11]. This speed does not imply any additional cost in terms of the number of gates since it is similar to that of the other designs proposed which offer an efficient hardware complexity [5,6,8,9,13,20].…”
Section: Implementation and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The parallel-pipeline architecture and arithmetic units operating at half the frequency gives an input data rate of 300 MHz, far higher than that of the fastest processor listed in this table [11]. This speed does not imply any additional cost in terms of the number of gates since it is similar to that of the other designs proposed which offer an efficient hardware complexity [5,6,8,9,13,20].…”
Section: Implementation and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As compared with the existing design listed in Table 3, the proposed processor is clearly superior in terms of speed even for those processors that use a better technology [11,15]. The parallel-pipeline architecture and arithmetic units operating at half the frequency gives an input data rate of 300 MHz, far higher than that of the fastest processor listed in this table [11].…”
Section: Implementation and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table II lists features of the proposed processor and other DCT implementations selected from among those which fulfill the specifications of the standard [2]. The parallel-pipeline architecture and arithmetic units operating at half the frequency gives an input data rate of 300MHz, far higher than that of the fastest processor listed in this table [3] [7]. This speed does not imply any additional cost in terms of the number of gates since it offers an efficient hardware implementation.…”
Section: Implementation and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the DCT has been applied for most of recent picture international standards as JPEG, MPEG, H.261 and H.263, as well as in high-definition television (HDTV) systems. The computation complexity requirements in many real-time applications often lead to the use of efficient dedicated hardware (ASIC's) operating at high speed with an acceptable cost in area [3]- [7]. This paper describes the architecture of an 8x8 2-D DCT/IDCT processor with a high input data rate and a cost-effective hardware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%