1990
DOI: 10.2514/3.10427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New correlation of roughness density effect on the turbulent boundary layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensions to the solidity parameter have already appeared in the literature and, for irregular surfaces, van Rij et al [15] redefined the parameter introduced by Sigal and Danberg [14], previously given in Equation (4). A generalisation of this approach is to set…”
Section: Parametrisation Of Topographical Properties For U + and Tkementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Extensions to the solidity parameter have already appeared in the literature and, for irregular surfaces, van Rij et al [15] redefined the parameter introduced by Sigal and Danberg [14], previously given in Equation (4). A generalisation of this approach is to set…”
Section: Parametrisation Of Topographical Properties For U + and Tkementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scarcity of data for three-dimensional roughness prevented the authors from developing a completely general model and as such their parameter is known to be better suited for two-dimensional roughness [13,14]. Through a series of channel flow experiments on smooth, patterned rough and completely rough surfaces, van Rij et al [15] proposed a more generalised form of the SigalDanberg parameter which could be applied to three-dimensional irregular roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2 shows that this is inconsistent with the experimental data. The correlation of Sigal and Danberg [17] has three regions, where a plateau separates the two legs of the triangle. At this plateau the ratio of k S /k = 8.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results Equivalent Sand Grain Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have proposed correlations to obtain the equivalent sand grain roughness. Among these are Sigal and Danberg [17], Dvorak [18], Simpson [19], Dirling [20],van Rij et al [21], and Waigh and Kind [22]. Common to all these correlations is the requirement that the roughness image or trace be modeled as a roughness geometry, in order to obtain values for projected and windward areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%