Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New constraints on the structure of the nuclear stellar cluster of the Milky Way from star counts and MIR imaging

Abstract: Context. The Milky Way nuclear star cluster (MWNSC) is a crucial laboratory for studying the galactic nuclei of other galaxies, but its properties have not been determined unambiguously until now. Aims. We aim to study the size and spatial structure of the MWNSC. Methods. This study uses data and methods that address potential shortcomings of previous studies on the topic. We use 0.2 angular resolution K s data to create a stellar density map in the central 86.4pc x 21pc at the Galactic center. We include data… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
69
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
10
69
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This points towards physically different components with different SFHs, in agreement with previous work (e.g. Launhardt et al 2002;Nishiyama et al 2013;Nogueras-Lara et al 2018b;Gallego-Cano et al 2020;Nogueras-Lara et al 2020a). In particular, the RC feature appears to be thicker for the NSD regions (excluding the NSD W, whose lower completeness avoids a good coverage for faint K s magnitudes), which is probably the result of the presence of a secondary RC feature due to a star formation event ∼ 1 Gyr ago that was responsible for the formation of ∼ 5 % of the stellar mass (Nogueras-Lara et al 2020a).…”
Section: De-reddened K S Luminosity Functionssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This points towards physically different components with different SFHs, in agreement with previous work (e.g. Launhardt et al 2002;Nishiyama et al 2013;Nogueras-Lara et al 2018b;Gallego-Cano et al 2020;Nogueras-Lara et al 2020a). In particular, the RC feature appears to be thicker for the NSD regions (excluding the NSD W, whose lower completeness avoids a good coverage for faint K s magnitudes), which is probably the result of the presence of a secondary RC feature due to a star formation event ∼ 1 Gyr ago that was responsible for the formation of ∼ 5 % of the stellar mass (Nogueras-Lara et al 2020a).…”
Section: De-reddened K S Luminosity Functionssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Gravity Collaboration et al 2018;Do et al 2019), with a standard distribution of 150 pc, corresponding to the effective radius of the NSD (e.g. Nishiyama et al 2013;Gallego-Cano et al 2020 We kept all the stars with K s < 18.3 mag, corresponding to the 50 % completeness limit of the GNS survey (Nogueras-Lara et al 2020b)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated that a change in ∼200 pc (∼ diameter of the NSD, e.g. Nishiyama et al 2013;Gallego-Cano et al 2020) can produce a variation of α HK s around 0.05. This effect is less important for α JH , where it accounts for ∼0.02.…”
Section: Grid Methods For Different Cuts In the Cmdmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As noted in Section 3.2, such star formation might also be related to the formation of the nuclear stellar cluster (NSC; see e.g. Genzel et al 2010;Schödel et al 2014;Gallego-Cano et al 2020).…”
Section: Trajectories Of Newly Born Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such star formation might also be related to the formation of the nuclear stellar cluster (NSC; see e.g. Genzel, Eisenhauer & Gillessen 2010;Schödel et al 2014;Gallego-Cano et al 2020) by providing in situ newly born stars and, since such stars are rotating, it might contribute to its observed rotation (Feldmeier et al 2014;Chatzopoulos et al 2015;Feldmeier-Krause et al 2015;Tsatsi et al 2017;Neumayer, Seth & Boeker 2020). Fig.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Star Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%