2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New constraints on the End-Triassic (Upper Norian–Rhaetian) magnetostratigraphy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The~9 m thick Steinbergkogel STKB + C section from Austria, containing toward its base the presumed first appearance of M. posthernsteini, bears largely reverse magnetic polarity and shows little magnetostratigraphic resemblance with the nearby~4 m thick Steinbergkogel STK-A section, a candidate GSSP for the base of the Rhaetian (defined by the first appearance of M. posthernsteini; Krystyn et al, 2007a). In the~30 m thick Oyuklu section from Turkey (Gallet et al, 2007), M. posthernsteini occurs broadly from the (faulted) section base to section top across strata dominated by normal magnetic polarity showing little visual matching with the presumably coeval Steinbergkogel STKB+ C section of mainly reverse polarity. In summary, there is no unique magnetostratigraphic correlation between the supposedly coeval but highly condensed Steinbergkogel STKB + C, Steinbergkogel STK-A, and Oyuklu sections (contra Krystyn et al, 2007b), or between Oyuklu and Pizzo Mondello (contra Gallet et al, 2007), or between Steinbergkogel or Oyuklu and the Brumano and Italcementi Quarry sections of this study, suggesting that these very thin and evidently highly condensed sections have significant cryptic internal hiatuses.…”
Section: The Norian-rhaetian Boundary and The Duration Of The Rhaetiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The~9 m thick Steinbergkogel STKB + C section from Austria, containing toward its base the presumed first appearance of M. posthernsteini, bears largely reverse magnetic polarity and shows little magnetostratigraphic resemblance with the nearby~4 m thick Steinbergkogel STK-A section, a candidate GSSP for the base of the Rhaetian (defined by the first appearance of M. posthernsteini; Krystyn et al, 2007a). In the~30 m thick Oyuklu section from Turkey (Gallet et al, 2007), M. posthernsteini occurs broadly from the (faulted) section base to section top across strata dominated by normal magnetic polarity showing little visual matching with the presumably coeval Steinbergkogel STKB+ C section of mainly reverse polarity. In summary, there is no unique magnetostratigraphic correlation between the supposedly coeval but highly condensed Steinbergkogel STKB + C, Steinbergkogel STK-A, and Oyuklu sections (contra Krystyn et al, 2007b), or between Oyuklu and Pizzo Mondello (contra Gallet et al, 2007), or between Steinbergkogel or Oyuklu and the Brumano and Italcementi Quarry sections of this study, suggesting that these very thin and evidently highly condensed sections have significant cryptic internal hiatuses.…”
Section: The Norian-rhaetian Boundary and The Duration Of The Rhaetiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short duration vs. long duration options for the Rhaetian, the youngest stage of the Triassic. According to the compilation of magneto-biostratigraphic data from the Tethyan realm of Krystyn et al (2002) and Gallet et al (2003) (Tethyan composite I), and recent data from Oyuklu (Gallet et al, 2007), the Rhaetian is~2 Myr in duration and in part missing in a supposed gap in the Newark APTS . According to data from Pizzo Mondello , the Rhaetian should be~6-7 Myr long, virtually similar in duration to the original estimate of Kent and Olsen (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, column 5). In this case, the Sevatian 2 becomes the Lower Rhaetian, in opposition with the former usage of the Sevatian 1 and 2 as lower and upper substages for the Upper Norian, having as index fossils Sagenites quinquepunctatus and Sagenites reticulatus and/or Paracochloceras suessi, respectively (Gallet et al , 2003(Gallet et al , 2007.…”
Section: Biostratigraphic Range and Chronostratigraphic Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krystyn 1988, Golebiowski 19905. Krystyn and Kuerschner 2005, Krystyn et al 2007a-b, Krystyn 2008a-b, Krystyn et al 2009, Maslo 2006, Muttoni et al 2010 two-faced creature", i.e. a Rhaetian sensu lato classically defined in terms of the Alpine Kössen stratotype, and a Rhaetian sensu stricto that is chronostratigraphically defined by the Choristoceras marshi Zone (sensu Tozer 1974, p. 203), which is the upper part of the Kössen.…”
Section: E Gràdinaru E S Sobolev Central European Geology 53 201mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The section is dated based on conodonts, ammonoids, and halobiids (Lukeneder et al 2012;Lukeneder & Lukeneder 2014). A detailed age assignment follows Krystyn et al (2002) and Gallet et al (2007). The strata dip approximmately 50° towards the Northeast.…”
Section: Lithology and Faciesmentioning
confidence: 99%