2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New cod war of words: ‘Cod is God’ versus ‘sod the cod’—Two opposed discourses on the North Sea Cod Recovery Programme

Abstract: distinction between hegemonic and challenging discourses, we analyse the conflict between them at 25 three levels: empirical; conceptual; and political. We consider moves to reconcile the two discourses in 26 a policy consensus on a revised CRP, which suggest that the challenging discourse (sod-the-cod) has 27 had some success in modifying the impact of the hegemonic discourse (cod-is-god). 28 29

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Content analysis was conducted for directly reported themes, such as those covered in the interview guide. To elucidate aspects of the relationship between wildlife and locals that are not immediately obvious from their interviews, the perspective of discourse analysis was also applied to interrogate the data for unprompted or underlying themes, as previously applied in conservation biology (Gray et al 2008;Bixler 2013). Coding cycles were iterative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Content analysis was conducted for directly reported themes, such as those covered in the interview guide. To elucidate aspects of the relationship between wildlife and locals that are not immediately obvious from their interviews, the perspective of discourse analysis was also applied to interrogate the data for unprompted or underlying themes, as previously applied in conservation biology (Gray et al 2008;Bixler 2013). Coding cycles were iterative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fishers and scientists commonly have diverging perceptions of resources and may be suspicious of the reliability of one another's perceptions (Hall-Arber 2003;Gray et al 2008), creating conflicts and barriers for integrating knowledge sources in multi-stakeholder arenas. Such 'cognitive conflicts' may be the main challenge in managing common pool natural resources (Adams et al 2003), while shared understandings can support collective action to sustain resources (Ostrom et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the lived 'reality' of resource users differs from scientific assessments, conflicts over management measures are likely, as frequently observed in fisheries (e.g. Gray et al, 2008), or in conflicts over larger scale environmental issues such as climate change (Hulme, 2009). We need a better understanding of psychological aspects of memory and perception not only to make better use of resource user knowledge but also to better understand conflicts in conservation and resource governance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%