2018
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201801225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Cobalt(II) Field‐Induced Single‐Molecule Magnet and the First Example of a Cobalt(III) Complex with Tridentate Binding of a Deprotonated 4‐Amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐Triazole Ligand

Abstract: From Co(NO3)2·6H2O ‐ NaN3 ‐ abpt reaction system, a mononuclear complex [Co(abpt)2(N3)2] (abpt = 4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole) (1) and a dinuclear complex [Co2(abpt)(µ‐abpt‐H)2(N3)4]·1.12H2O (2) were obtained. The presence of neutral abpt, as well as azido ligands was proved by IR spectroscopy. X‐ray crystallography shows that 1 is a molecular CoII complex with two azido ligands coordinated in trans‐positions, while 2 is a dinuclear CoIII complex bridged by two abpt‐H ligands. π–π stacking inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of Co(II) compounds 1 and 2 , the best agreement with the experimental data was found for negative and large D ‐values, D =−68.6 cm −1 for 1 and D =−39.9 cm −1 for 2 , with significant rhombicity, E / D >0.2. Negative D ‐parameter was found also in similar systems like [Co(abpt) 2 (N 3 ) 2 ] (abpt=4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole) [6b] and [Co(bppCOOMe) 2 ](ClO 4 ) 2 (bppCOOMe=methyl 2,6‐di(pyrazol‐1‐yl)pyridine‐4‐carboxylate), [19] and it is due to significant deviation from O h ligand‐field symmetry. Next, Fe(II) compounds 3 – 4 were analyzed resulting in D =11.0 cm −1 for 3 and D =3.92 cm −1 for 4 with practically zero rhombicity parameter E / D in both cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In case of Co(II) compounds 1 and 2 , the best agreement with the experimental data was found for negative and large D ‐values, D =−68.6 cm −1 for 1 and D =−39.9 cm −1 for 2 , with significant rhombicity, E / D >0.2. Negative D ‐parameter was found also in similar systems like [Co(abpt) 2 (N 3 ) 2 ] (abpt=4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole) [6b] and [Co(bppCOOMe) 2 ](ClO 4 ) 2 (bppCOOMe=methyl 2,6‐di(pyrazol‐1‐yl)pyridine‐4‐carboxylate), [19] and it is due to significant deviation from O h ligand‐field symmetry. Next, Fe(II) compounds 3 – 4 were analyzed resulting in D =11.0 cm −1 for 3 and D =3.92 cm −1 for 4 with practically zero rhombicity parameter E / D in both cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Recently, we designed and constructed a variety of SIM coordination compounds with abpt and various types of linear and non-linear pseudohalide anions, except dicyanamide (dca). 5 a , b ,15 Dca shows different binding modes, which allows it to form coordination complexes with interesting structural and magnetic properties. This versatility of dca ligand also prompted chemists to use it for crystal engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, SMMs with S > 1 present a barrier to magnetization reversal, [10][11][12] while SMMs with S < 1 undergo light-induced magnetization. [13][14][15] For practical applications, the amplitude of the magnetization, its relaxation time and its blocking temperature should be maximized. [16][17][18] The possibilities of augmenting the magnetization by simply increasing the number of spins N are intrinsically limited, due to the fact that the spins cannot be easily controlled in SMMs of high nuclearity [19] and that D only scales as S (rather than S 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%