1993
DOI: 10.1002/anie.199307231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Chiral Porphyrins—Syntheses and Molecular Recognition of Amino Acid Esters

Abstract: of these products is clearly demonstrated by their circular dichroism (CD) spectra, which show completely symmetric Cotton effects in the region of the Soret bands. The analogous reaction with 4-nitroisophthaloyl chloride gave, following chromatographic separation, meso-2 and 2/ent-2; the enantiomers could be separated again by HPLC.14] All compounds were characterized by 'H NMR spectroscopy and fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry (FAB-MS).In spite of the slight difference between the bridging positions of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the basic idea of a three‐point interaction continues to be well accepted (Davankov 1997; Pirkle 1997; Copeland 2000; Ahn et al 2001), and explanations similar to the TPA model have been proposed for a variety of stereoselective receptors. These include enzymatic systems (Fersht 1999; Copeland 2000), H‐2 receptors for histamine (Nederkoorn et al 1996), ligand binding to chiral porphyrins (Kuroda et al 1993), taste receptors for sweetness (Shallenberger and Acree 1967; Suami and Hough 1993), and inclusion complexes in cyclodextrins (Ahn et al 2001). The three‐point interaction model is also often cited to explain the mechanisms behind chromatographic enantioresolutions and to design chiral stationary phases and mobile phases for use in chromatography (Dalgliesh 1952; Davankov and Kurganov 1983; Pirkle et al 1983; Nesterenko et al 1994; Morris et al 1996; Vidyasankar et al 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the basic idea of a three‐point interaction continues to be well accepted (Davankov 1997; Pirkle 1997; Copeland 2000; Ahn et al 2001), and explanations similar to the TPA model have been proposed for a variety of stereoselective receptors. These include enzymatic systems (Fersht 1999; Copeland 2000), H‐2 receptors for histamine (Nederkoorn et al 1996), ligand binding to chiral porphyrins (Kuroda et al 1993), taste receptors for sweetness (Shallenberger and Acree 1967; Suami and Hough 1993), and inclusion complexes in cyclodextrins (Ahn et al 2001). The three‐point interaction model is also often cited to explain the mechanisms behind chromatographic enantioresolutions and to design chiral stationary phases and mobile phases for use in chromatography (Dalgliesh 1952; Davankov and Kurganov 1983; Pirkle et al 1983; Nesterenko et al 1994; Morris et al 1996; Vidyasankar et al 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…land 2000), H-2 receptors for histamine (Nederkoorn et al 1996), ligand binding to chiral porphyrins (Kuroda et al 1993), taste receptors for sweetness (Shallenberger and Acree 1967;Suami and Hough 1993), and inclusion complexes in cyclodextrins (Ahn et al 2001). The three-point interaction model is also often cited to explain the mechanisms behind chromatographic enantioresolutions and to design chiral stationary phases and mobile phases for use in chromatography (Dalgliesh 1952;Davankov and Kurganov 1983;Pirkle et al 1983;Nesterenko et al 1994;Morris et al 1996;Vidyasankar et al 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pioneering research concerning the chiral recognition of amino acids and corresponding methyl ester derivatives was from Professor Y. Kuroda's group. In fact, between 1993 and 1995, they reported a systematic synthesis of several chiral porphyrinoids to discriminate amino acid methyl esters (Figure 1a-d, I-IV) [55][56][57][58]. In fact, in amino acids, both amino and carboxyl moieties are expected to behave as sites for hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions (Figure 1e), whilst the α-R group may form further binding sites (i.e., van der Waals forces, hydrophobic interactions, steric hindrance).…”
Section: Monomeric Porphynoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, if the host system contains a metal ion, a coordination interaction may occur between the guest amino acid and the host system. As a consequence, Kuroda et al, designed Zinc(II)-porphyrin derivatives having two (Figure 1c, III) or three (Figure 1d, IV) recognition elements (i.e., metal coordination, hydrogen bond donor, and hydrogen bond acceptor-or steric repulsion groups) in order to realize a convergent chiral recognition pocket (Figure 1f) [55][56][57][58]. In particular, chiral doubly bridged free-base tetraarylporphyrins (Figure 1a,b I-II), chiral Zinc(II) porphyrins with three arms (5, 10, 15-meso positions, III) and Zinc(II) with two functional arms (5, 15-meso positions, IV) were synthesized as racemic mixtures and resolved by chiral HPLC.…”
Section: Monomeric Porphynoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 -10 As Davankov points out, 7 models that feature two points of attachment 4 also require a third point of interaction to explain chiral recognition. The TPI model has been accepted for biological systems like enzymes 9,11 and receptors, 12 -14 chemical systems such as cyclodextrins, 10 chiral porphyrins, 15 and chromatographic chiral stationary phases and mobile phases. 16 -21 On the other hand, there has also been much controversy over the TPI model, 7,8,22,23 and alternative scenarios have been proposed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%