2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.09.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New ‘chemical probes’ to examine the role of the hFPRL1 (or ALXR) receptor in inflammation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compound 1 and 2 in this study (Fig 1) are enantiomers of an earlier described FPR2 agonist (Acadia C7; http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2005047899), that has been shown to dose dependently prevent hyperalgesia induced by carrageenan in a rat model. It should be noticed that large differences have been described for receptor agonists and their enantiomers [41], but in our hands compound 1 and 2 were equally potent, but not among the most potent neutrophil activators in. Compound 3 used in this study is a substituted quinazinolione (QuinC1), that has been described to be chemotactic and induce degranulation in neutrophils [42], but be unable to stimulate superoxide production [15].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compound 1 and 2 in this study (Fig 1) are enantiomers of an earlier described FPR2 agonist (Acadia C7; http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=2005047899), that has been shown to dose dependently prevent hyperalgesia induced by carrageenan in a rat model. It should be noticed that large differences have been described for receptor agonists and their enantiomers [41], but in our hands compound 1 and 2 were equally potent, but not among the most potent neutrophil activators in. Compound 3 used in this study is a substituted quinazinolione (QuinC1), that has been described to be chemotactic and induce degranulation in neutrophils [42], but be unable to stimulate superoxide production [15].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…The described non-peptide ligands for FPR1 and 2 may also serve as the nucleus for further structural modifications leading to the discovery of more potent and efficacious agonists. This type of work has been performed 21 already, using the pyrazolone originally described as an FPR2 agonist, and an even more potent FPR2 agonist has been described together with a 100 fold less active enatiomer [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we rescreened a subset of this compound library for novel FPR1/FPR2 agonists using a Ca 2ϩ mobilization assay. The subset of 6000 compounds was selected from the parent library as compounds that contained at least two heterocycles separated by a chemical linker with Ͼ2 bonds, because previous studies have shown that these characteristics are almost always present in nonpeptide FPR1/FPR2 agonists (Nanamori et al, 2004;Edwards et al, 2005;Bü rli et al, 2006;Frohn et al, 2007;Schepetkin et al, 2007Schepetkin et al, , 2008Zhou et al, 2007). To distinguish between FPR1 and FPR2 agonists, we performed primary high-throughput screening for compounds that activated Ca 2ϩ mobilization in RBL cell lines transfected with either human FPR1 or FPR2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For development of the FPR1 ligand-binding site template, we chose 1910-5441 (Edwards et al, 2005) and AG-14 (Schepetkin et al, 2008), two previously reported FPR1 agonists, and AG-09/2. Two previously reported FPR2 agonists, Bü rli-25 (Bü rli et al, 2006) and Frohn-11 (Frohn et al, 2007), and three agonists identified here (AG-09/5, AG-09/74, and AG-26) were selected for development of the FPR2 ligand-binding site template. Using the conformer hunt algorithm (FieldTemplater Version 2.0.1), we generated up to 100 independent conformations lying within 6-kcal/mol energy gap above the lowestenergy geometry for each of the molecules.…”
Section: Characterization Of Novel Fpr1/fpr2 Agonists 165mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five agonists with known enantiomeric configurations and relatively high activity at FPR2 were chosen for pharmacophore modeling. The selected structures included PD168368, AG-10/5, AG-10/8, AG-10/17, and compound 11 from (Frohn et al, 2007) [1-((5-methoxyindol-2-yl)carbonyl)-3-(2-ethylbenzimidazol-1-yl)(3R)pyrrolidine; designated here as . We used a ligand-based approach for molecular modeling based on the use of field points (Cheeseright et al, 2007), as described in our previous studies (Kirpotina et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%