2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10801-019-00876-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New characterizations of freeness for hyperplane arrangements

Abstract: In this article we describe two new characterizations of freeness for hyperplane arrangements via the study of the generic initial ideal and of the sectional matrix of the Jacobian ideal of arrangements. DI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that Terao described this result for characteristic 0, but the statement holds true for any characteristic as shown in [10]. In [4], the authors connected the study of generic initial ideals to the one of arrangements, obtaining a new characterization of freeness via the generic initial ideal of the Jacobian ideal. with 1 ≤ λ 1 < λ 2 < · · · < λ n−1 and λ i+1 − λ i = 1 or 2.…”
Section: Preliminares On Hyperplane Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Notice that Terao described this result for characteristic 0, but the statement holds true for any characteristic as shown in [10]. In [4], the authors connected the study of generic initial ideals to the one of arrangements, obtaining a new characterization of freeness via the generic initial ideal of the Jacobian ideal. with 1 ≤ λ 1 < λ 2 < · · · < λ n−1 and λ i+1 − λ i = 1 or 2.…”
Section: Preliminares On Hyperplane Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In fact, freeness implies several interesting geometric and combinatorial properties of the arrangement itself. See for example [18], [20], [4], [7] and [12].…”
Section: Free Hyperplane Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difference sets were first studied in relation to finite geometries [Singer 1938] and have connections to symmetric designs, coding theory, and many other fields of mathematics [Moore and Pollatsek 2013;Davis and Jedwab 1996;Colbourn and Dinitz 1996;Beth et al 1999].…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large libraries of difference sets are useful for developing conjectures and building examples. Gordon provides an extensive library of difference sets in abelian groups [Gordon], but has no results for nonabelian groups, which do show distinct behavior [Smith 1995]. A wide variety of techniques can be used to construct difference sets for these libraries (see, for example, [Dillon 1985] and [Davis and Jedwab 1997]), but fully enumerating all difference sets in a given group requires some amount of exhaustive search, which can quickly become computationally infeasible.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation