2021
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09429-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New canonical analysis for higher order topologically massive gravity

Abstract: A detailed Gitman–Lyakhovich–Tyutin analysis for higher-order topologically massive gravity is performed. The full structure of the constraints, the counting of physical degrees of freedom, and the Dirac algebra among the constraints are reported. Moreover, our analysis presents a new structure into the constraints and we compare our results with those reported in the literature where a standard Ostrogradski framework was developed.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, after a long algebraic work, we find that the matrix W IJ has 12 null vectors, therefore, this implies that will there 12 first class constraints [19]. The first class constraints are given given by…”
Section: The Gitman-lyakhovich-tyutin Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, after a long algebraic work, we find that the matrix W IJ has 12 null vectors, therefore, this implies that will there 12 first class constraints [19]. The first class constraints are given given by…”
Section: The Gitman-lyakhovich-tyutin Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We can observe that the action is a higher order theory and we will use the GLT method for performing the canonical analysis. By following the GLT framework, we introduce the following change of variables [18,19]…”
Section: The Gitman-lyakhovich-tyutin Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the identification of the constraints is not easy to develop; in some cases, the constraints are fixed by hand in order to obtain a consistent algebra [33] and this yields the opportunity to work with alternative methods. On the other hand, the GLT framework is based on the introduction of extra variables which transforms a problem with higher time derivatives to one with only first-order ones then, by using the Dirac brackets the second class constraints and the extra variables can be removed [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%