2014
DOI: 10.1364/ol.39.000398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New bounds on the capacity of the nonlinear fiber-optic channel

Abstract: We revisit the problem of estimating the nonlinear channel capacity of fiber-optic systems. By taking advantage of the fact that a large fraction of the nonlinear interference between different wavelength-division-multiplexed channels manifests itself as phase noise, and by accounting for the long temporal correlations of this noise, we show that the capacity is notably higher than what is currently assumed. This advantage translates into nearly doubling of the link distance for a fixed transmission rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When employing conventional detection strategies optimized for a linear channel, the AIR with Gaussian input symbols increases with power, reaches a maximum, and then decreases to zero. The AIR can be slightly increased by means of improved detection strategies [88,89]; and its maximum can be used to derive a nondecreasing capacity lower bound [90]. However, while such a lower bound saturates to a finite value, the tighter known upper bound increases indefinitely with power as the capacity of the AWGN channel [91], which leaves open the question of whether and when we will experience a capacity crunch due to fiber nonlinearity.…”
Section: Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When employing conventional detection strategies optimized for a linear channel, the AIR with Gaussian input symbols increases with power, reaches a maximum, and then decreases to zero. The AIR can be slightly increased by means of improved detection strategies [88,89]; and its maximum can be used to derive a nondecreasing capacity lower bound [90]. However, while such a lower bound saturates to a finite value, the tighter known upper bound increases indefinitely with power as the capacity of the AWGN channel [91], which leaves open the question of whether and when we will experience a capacity crunch due to fiber nonlinearity.…”
Section: Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimensionality of the optimization problem is thus reduced to 1, however, the dimensionality of the MI estimation problem is still governed by the cardinality |B| = |X | M +1 of the branches in the receiver. Observe that this type of constraint contains the ball-shaped input from [15], [16] as a special case, since for large |λ M B |, most of the mass of the constellation is concentrated on a single amplitude in the multi-dimensional space (the points with largest amplitude for λ < 0 and the points with lowest amplitude for λ > 0) . When |X | → ∞ and |λ M B | is large, the constellation is a multi-dimensional sphere.…”
Section: Maxwell-boltzmann Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gains of such methods are therefore limited to the above mentioned scenarios, where the autocorrelation function (ACF) of the NLPN is long enough to allow for such tracking. Frequency domain equalization is used in [5], while time-domain sliding window averaging is used in [6]. A more sophisticated trellis-based method was used in [7], which allows for increasing the optimal launch power and thereby the achievable information rate (AIR) by around 5-10%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%