2019
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnz293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Bounds of Weyl Sums

Abstract: We augment the method of Wooley (2015) by some new ideas and in a series of results, improve his metric bounds on the Weyl sums and the discrepancy of fractional parts of real polynomials with partially prescribed coefficients.We also extend these results and ideas to principally new and very general settings of arbitrary orthogonal projections of the vectors of the coefficients (u 1 , . . . , u d ) onto a lower dimensional subspace. This new point of view has an additional advantage of yielding an upper bound… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where 0 < α ≤ d. We extend the results of Chen and Shparlinski in [13] and Barron in [4] in T to the higher dimension T d for d ≥ 2, and obtain (1.14) for S α (N ) characterizes the extent of the occurrence for the square root cancellation for the Weyl sums ω N (x, t). It is easy to see that when (x, t) equals (0, 0) ∈ T d+1 or approximates (0, 0), constructive interference for ω N (x, t) occurs, that is…”
Section: (D+1)supporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where 0 < α ≤ d. We extend the results of Chen and Shparlinski in [13] and Barron in [4] in T to the higher dimension T d for d ≥ 2, and obtain (1.14) for S α (N ) characterizes the extent of the occurrence for the square root cancellation for the Weyl sums ω N (x, t). It is easy to see that when (x, t) equals (0, 0) ∈ T d+1 or approximates (0, 0), constructive interference for ω N (x, t) occurs, that is…”
Section: (D+1)supporting
confidence: 62%
“…We recall the lower bound of S N,k (x k , t) given by Chen and Shparlinski in [13] and [15], where for…”
Section: Hausdorff Dimension Of the Large Value Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we have the trivial bound sup α,γ | f 1,k (α, α + γ ; Q)| Q, and it is known (see e.g. [6,Corollary 2.2]) that for independent variables γ , α we have | f 1,k (α, α + γ ; Q)| Q 1/2+ε almost everywhere. It turns out that in our case where only one of the variables is restricted to lie in the complement of a thin set while the other one ranges freely, the bound is appreciably larger.…”
Section: Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Let Θ k denote the set of all θ ∈ R such that for almost all γ ∈ [0, 1) one has 12) and set θ k = inf Θ k . The size of θ k and related quantities has recently been studied by Chen and Shparlinski [6], building on work by Wooley [21]. Clearly, one sees that…”
Section: Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More general restriction estimates for cubic sums were initiated by Bourgain [2] and further developed in [12,13,14]. See [5,6] for various bounds related to the metric behaviour of large values of Weyl sums and [3] for other metric results and an asymptotic formula for minor arc sums.…”
Section: Note That (1) Impliesmentioning
confidence: 99%