2016
DOI: 10.1097/mib.0000000000000903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Biomarkers for Diagnosing Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Assessing Treatment Outcomes

Abstract: Despite advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology underlying Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), there remains a significant need for biomarkers that can differentiate between Crohn's Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) with high sensitivity and specificity, in a cost-efficient manner. As the focus on personalized approaches to the delivery of medical treatment increases, new biomarkers are being developed to predict an individual's response to therapy as well as their overall disease course. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fecal and serologic biomarkers could also be used in the diagnosis and management of IBD . Several biomarkers specifically calprotectin, lactoferrin, anti‐glycoprotein 2, anti‐granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor, anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, and anti‐ Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody have been studied regarding the ability to identify patients with IBD precisely . However, they have limited diagnostic values for making definite diagnosis for IBD.…”
Section: Bacterial Infectious Agents Implicated In the Pathogenesis Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fecal and serologic biomarkers could also be used in the diagnosis and management of IBD . Several biomarkers specifically calprotectin, lactoferrin, anti‐glycoprotein 2, anti‐granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor, anti‐neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, and anti‐ Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody have been studied regarding the ability to identify patients with IBD precisely . However, they have limited diagnostic values for making definite diagnosis for IBD.…”
Section: Bacterial Infectious Agents Implicated In the Pathogenesis Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High sensitivity CRP is a common non-specific marker of inflammation that can be elevated in patients with active IBD (20,21). However, CRP can be challenging to use as a biomarker due to its low specificity and high expression heterogeneity (22,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basic research in IBD during the last few years has made significant advances in unveiling genetic loci of susceptibility, [ 10 , 11 ] revealing fundamental insights into enteric microbiota structures and their interaction with the innate and adaptive immune systems, [ 12 ] as well as discovering novel functions for and the regulation of previously recognized innate immune cells [ 13 ]. Additional research efforts have been initiated to predict treatment outcome, [ 14 , 15 ] and define risk stratification for disease progression in addition to shedding light on potential environmental triggers and their role in initiating post-infectious functional gastrointestinal disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome and IBD [ [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] ].…”
Section: Study Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%