2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New asymptotic giant branch models for a range of metallicities

Abstract: We present a new grid of stellar model calculations for stars on the Asymptotic Giant Branch between 1.0 and 6.0 M . Our grid consists of 10 chemical mixtures with 5 metallicities between Z = 0.0005 and Z = 0.04, and with both solar-like and α-element enhanced metal ratios for each metallicity. We treat consistently the carbon-enhancement of the stellar envelopes by using opacity tables with varying C/O-ratio and by employing theoretical mass loss rates for carbon stars. The low temperature opacities have been… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

41
315
2
18

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(376 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
41
315
2
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, updated low-temperature molecular opacities with varying C/O ratios are used. To this end, we adopted the low-temperature opacities computed at Wichita State University (Ferguson et al 2005) and presented by Weiss & Ferguson (2009). In LPCODE, molecular opacities are computed by adopting the opacity tables with the correct abundances of the unenhanced metals (e.g., Fe) and C/O ratio.…”
Section: Numerical Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, updated low-temperature molecular opacities with varying C/O ratios are used. To this end, we adopted the low-temperature opacities computed at Wichita State University (Ferguson et al 2005) and presented by Weiss & Ferguson (2009). In LPCODE, molecular opacities are computed by adopting the opacity tables with the correct abundances of the unenhanced metals (e.g., Fe) and C/O ratio.…”
Section: Numerical Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, trying to fit all available observational constraints by means of a simple overshooting prescription might not be even possible [see Weiss & Ferguson (2009); Karakas & Lattanzio (2014);Miller Bertolami (2016)]. This fact, together with the lack of compelling theoretical arguments and the lack of a common observational benchmark for AGB theoretical evolution models has led authors to the adoption of very different approaches.…”
Section: And Hot Bottom Burning (Hbb) To Develop At Lower Initial Masmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the standard set of evolutionary tracks for post-AGB stars obtained by Blöcker (1995), which are supplemented with lower-mass models from Schönberner (1983). Alternative post-AGB model tracks are presented by Vassiliadis & Wood (1994) and Weiss & Ferguson (2009). We assume that the post-AGB stars evolve as hydrogen burners.…”
Section: Post-agb Model Tracksmentioning
confidence: 99%