1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199907)55:7<797::aid-jclp3>3.0.co;2-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New areas for psychological assessment in general health care settings: What to do today to prepare for tomorrow

Abstract: Unique roles of the professional psychologist are outlined with respect to increasingly restrictive utilization practices of managed care. Suggestions of how to develop less traditional venues of practice, the types of instruments to use, and report formats, along with ways to persuade primary care physicians (PCPs), managed care organizations, and facilities to utilize psychological assessment services are provided. Medical cost offsets, cost-efficient quality of care, and models of practice are also discusse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past several decades, numerous commentators on testing and assessment practices in a range of applied psychology domains have called for greater attention to the role that incremental validity data should play in determining psychologists' use of interviews, observations, and psychological tests (e.g., Elliott, O'Donohue, & Nickerson, 1993;Mash & Hunsley, 2004;Meyer & Archer, 2001;Stout & Cook, 1999;Widiger & Schilling, 1980;Wiggins, 1973). Despite this, there has been little systematic effort in most areas of applied psychology to evaluate the incremental validity of measures and assessment procedures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past several decades, numerous commentators on testing and assessment practices in a range of applied psychology domains have called for greater attention to the role that incremental validity data should play in determining psychologists' use of interviews, observations, and psychological tests (e.g., Elliott, O'Donohue, & Nickerson, 1993;Mash & Hunsley, 2004;Meyer & Archer, 2001;Stout & Cook, 1999;Widiger & Schilling, 1980;Wiggins, 1973). Despite this, there has been little systematic effort in most areas of applied psychology to evaluate the incremental validity of measures and assessment procedures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%