2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2016.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New archeointensity data from French Early Medieval pottery production (6th–10th century AD). Tracing 1500 years of geomagnetic field intensity variations in Western Europe

Abstract: a b s t r a c tNineteen new archeointensity results were obtained from the analysis of groups of French pottery fragments dated to the Early Middle Ages (6th to 10th centuries AD). They are from several medieval ceramic production sites, excavated mainly in Saran (Central France), and their precise dating was established based on typo-chronological characteristics. Intensity measurements were performed using the Triaxe protocol, which takes into account the effects on the intensity determinations of both therm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
12
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genevey et al 30. observed in their Western European master curve five prominent peaks in the last 1500 years, with a recurrence of 250 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Genevey et al 30. observed in their Western European master curve five prominent peaks in the last 1500 years, with a recurrence of 250 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison with several palaeosecular variation curves has also been made (Fig. 3a): the master curve for Western Europe30 (GEN; Fig. 3a), the Western European Bayesian and Bootstrap curves2 (GBA and GBO, respectively; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, new evidence of short-lived regional maxima intensity episodes has been recently recovered but the spatial and temporal variation of these features is still poorly understood (e.g. Shaar et al 2011;de Groot et al 2013;Genevey et al 2016;Gómez-Paccard et al 2016). One of the most important constraints for the accurate description of the geomagnetic field strength evolution in the past is the absence of continuous records due to the limited availability of well-dated archaeological material suitable for archaeointensity determinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%