2017
DOI: 10.5719/hgeo.2017.111.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New approaches to sustainable rural development: Social farming as an opportunity in Europe?

Abstract: The so-called "Green Revolution" has marginalized and depopulated many rural areas, but economic diversication has emerged since the 1980s. Consumer appreciation for organic farming and proximity sourcing has increased, and farmers have responded to this market. Since 2008 the economic crisis has led to importation of low-quality food products at an unsustainable level of energy costs, and the lack of employment opportunity has led people to seek economic opportunities in the countryside, producing foods with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Maleki [40] listed basic criteria for ensuring social sustainability in rural Iran, which includes security, population, social collaboration, health, leisure, employment, and education. Tulla et al [41] proposed social agriculture as an opportunity for social sustainability for all of Europe. Nirathron and Whitford [42] studied the political influence on social and economic sustainability in rural areas of Thailand and Australia.…”
Section: Rural Tourism and Sustainability In Collaborative Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maleki [40] listed basic criteria for ensuring social sustainability in rural Iran, which includes security, population, social collaboration, health, leisure, employment, and education. Tulla et al [41] proposed social agriculture as an opportunity for social sustainability for all of Europe. Nirathron and Whitford [42] studied the political influence on social and economic sustainability in rural areas of Thailand and Australia.…”
Section: Rural Tourism and Sustainability In Collaborative Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, the use of agricultural holdings is a distinguishing feature, especially with CF and SF. Another important factor, in addition to improving the participants' quality of life, is the territorial relevance of SF [13], given that the practices contribute to the creation of new strategies of local development, new alliances between agriculture and socio-health care, and new models of care and general wellbeing. Furthermore, SF is a stimulus that can make new services available to the rural population, for whom they may be much less accessible than in urban areas, as well as supporting high-quality, ecological proximity agriculture, with the added value of social justice [61].…”
Section: (Neo)liberal Model Mixed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with a longer tradition of ecological practices [12]. One significant feature of SF projects in the countryside is close relationships with other actors in the territory who are trying to attain sustainable rural development [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este sentido, esta práctica subyace como una estrategia para generar economías locales de nueva creación, más centradas en las especificidades, las potencialidades y las oportunidades de cada territorio, que en las tendencias y la conectividad con la economía global (Estela, 2015). Es por eso que la AS se presenta con diferentes formas en distintos territorios, heterogeneidad resultado de las estrategias de resiliencia de cada territorio para dar respuesta a sus retos y adaptarse a los cambios (Tulla et al, 2017).…”
Section: Consideraciones Finalesunclassified