2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New approaches in reliability based optimization of tuned mass damper in presence of uncertain bounded parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the work conducted here, it's assumed that the possible variations of the value k ij of the stiffness matrix K can be described by the parameter δ k such that kij[],kitalicijLkitalicijU=[],ktrue¯ijδkktrue¯ijktrue¯ij+δkktrue¯ij, where kijL and kijU are the lower and upper bounds of the stiffness value whereas ktrue¯ij is the nominal value corresponding to the deterministic context. Furthermore, it's assumed that the eigenfrequencies of the structure are monotonic functions in the interval of variation of the uncertain parameter 48,49 ; this assumption ensures that no turning point exists (in the range of variation of the uncertain parameter) and, consequently, the extreme values of the eigenfrequencies can be obtained using the extreme values of the uncertain parameter 48,49 …”
Section: Optimization Strategies Of the Tmd Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the work conducted here, it's assumed that the possible variations of the value k ij of the stiffness matrix K can be described by the parameter δ k such that kij[],kitalicijLkitalicijU=[],ktrue¯ijδkktrue¯ijktrue¯ij+δkktrue¯ij, where kijL and kijU are the lower and upper bounds of the stiffness value whereas ktrue¯ij is the nominal value corresponding to the deterministic context. Furthermore, it's assumed that the eigenfrequencies of the structure are monotonic functions in the interval of variation of the uncertain parameter 48,49 ; this assumption ensures that no turning point exists (in the range of variation of the uncertain parameter) and, consequently, the extreme values of the eigenfrequencies can be obtained using the extreme values of the uncertain parameter 48,49 …”
Section: Optimization Strategies Of the Tmd Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it's assumed that the eigenfrequencies of the structure are monotonic functions in the interval of variation of the uncertain parameter 48,49 ; this assumption ensures that no turning point exists (in the range of variation of the uncertain parameter) and, consequently, the extreme values of the eigenfrequencies can be obtained using the extreme values of the uncertain parameter. 48,49 Suppose that a targeted frequency ϖ should be controlled; when the stiffness values k ij are perturbed and turned out to their extreme values (k L ij and k U ij ), the deterministic targeted frequency is obviously perturbed and two new frequencies (ϖ À and ϖ + ), corresponding to k L ij and k U ij , are obtained. The obtained perturbed targeted frequencies can be schematized as shown in Figure 2b where ϖ À correspond to a decreased frequency whereas ϖ + correspond to an increased one.…”
Section: The Robust Multimodal Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TMD optimal design values for f opt and ζ d,opt are derived by minimizing the dynamic amplification factor regarding the 2-DOF system which are basically extracted from the decoupled target mode and the TMD, using a numerical optimization. Based on these design values, the optimum design stiffness and damping coefficient values are calculated by Equations (12) and (13). Recently, several studies, where a number of time history analyses were conducted by directly considering the seismic load and simplified MDOF dynamic numerical analysis models, and based on this, optimal TMD design values were derived through numerical optimization techniques, have been studied [14,15].…”
Section: Tmd Optimal Design Approach For a Piping Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed design method was done by replacing a damped MDOF structure with a damped SDOF structure of the target mode, which needs to be mitigated, and then numerically obtaining the optimal TMD design values based on such a SDOF structure. Besides the above studies, other studies have been done by many researchers to find the optimal TMD design values for diverse seismic loadings through various numerical optimization techniques for the purpose of enhancing the seismic performance of structures of interest [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. One study [17] presented a TMD design framework that could consider two types of uncertainties such as the stochastic excitation modeling of an earthquake, and the inherent uncertainty of internal parameters of the damping device and the subsoil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marano et al 37 proposed a fuzzy-based and intervalbased optimal framework that modeled the uncertainties of structures and an environment. Mrabet et al 38,39 presented a performance index and reliability index-based optimal design framework for the uncertainties in a structure system that seemed to have given bounds but not a concrete distribution form. As mentioned above, the fuzzy expression of uncertainty may resort to the precise formulation of the fuzzy numbers of a variable, 40 while the interval model of uncertainties may lead to an overconservative result that loses feasibility for civil engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%