Day 3 Wed, January 15, 2020 2020
DOI: 10.2523/iptc-19962-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Approach to History Matching of Simulation Models with Discrete Fracture Networks

Abstract: Simulations of fractured reservoirs are usually performed by dual porosity, dual permeability models. Traditional deterministic workflows that model prominent fracture lineaments often fail to integrate quantification of uncertainty, inherent in fracture spatial distribution and properties. This poses significant challenges on history matching and frequently requires extensive manual beyond geological consistency to achieve the match. We present a method for assisted history matching (AHM) that calibrates mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The workflow for simultaneous closed loop inversion of DFN simulation models [14,15] is schematically depicted in Figure 11. It is initialized with rigorous multivariate uncertainty quantification (UQ ), where probability distribution functions with associated tolerances of sampling intervals for all relevant modeling parameters and variables are defined in close collaboration between the geo-modeler, fracture modeler and simulation engineer.…”
Section: Closed Loop Dpdp Model Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The workflow for simultaneous closed loop inversion of DFN simulation models [14,15] is schematically depicted in Figure 11. It is initialized with rigorous multivariate uncertainty quantification (UQ ), where probability distribution functions with associated tolerances of sampling intervals for all relevant modeling parameters and variables are defined in close collaboration between the geo-modeler, fracture modeler and simulation engineer.…”
Section: Closed Loop Dpdp Model Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%