1973
DOI: 10.1038/physci245097a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Approach to General Relativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, the equivalence principle suggests to only take the metric as dynamical variable [76] representing the gravitational field (to which matter then couples universally), whereas diffeomorphism invariance, derivability from an invariant Lagrangian (alternatively: local energy-momentum conservation in the sense of covariant divergencelessness), dependence of the equations on the metric up to at most second derivatives, and, finally, four-dimensionality lead uniquely to the left-hand side of Einstein's equation, including a possibly non-vanishing cosmological constant [54]. Here we will review how this 'deduction' works in the Hamiltonian setting on phase space T * Riem(Σ), which goes back to [40,41,51,74].…”
Section: Intermezzo: Gr As Simplest Representation Of Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More precisely, the equivalence principle suggests to only take the metric as dynamical variable [76] representing the gravitational field (to which matter then couples universally), whereas diffeomorphism invariance, derivability from an invariant Lagrangian (alternatively: local energy-momentum conservation in the sense of covariant divergencelessness), dependence of the equations on the metric up to at most second derivatives, and, finally, four-dimensionality lead uniquely to the left-hand side of Einstein's equation, including a possibly non-vanishing cosmological constant [54]. Here we will review how this 'deduction' works in the Hamiltonian setting on phase space T * Riem(Σ), which goes back to [40,41,51,74].…”
Section: Intermezzo: Gr As Simplest Representation Of Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is necessary in order to interpret {−, H (α, β)} as a generator (on phase-space functions) of a spacetime evolution corresponding to a normal lapse α and tangential shift β. In other words, the evolution of observables from an initial hypersurface Σ i to a final hypersurface Σ f must be independent of the intermediate foliation ('integrability' or 'path independence' [40,41,74]). Therefore we placed the parameters (α , β ) outside the Poisson bracket on the right-hand side of (27), to indicate that no differentiation with respect to h, π should act on them.…”
Section: Why Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"25 Simple as this derivation is, we today have one still simpler, which comes from Hojman et aZ. 26 It does not ask us to adopt one part of a Lagrangian, because it is quadratic in the electromagnetic field, and another because it is the simplest curvature-dependent scalar. Instead, it invites us to look at the "group" of deformations of a spacelike hypersurface (FIGURE 7).…”
Section: No "Machinery" Evident Behind Electromagnetism and Gravitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spatial diffeomorphism symmetry is physically relevant. Such theories cannot obey the Dirac algebra which is the hallmark of space-time covariance and the embeddability of hypersurface deformations, and from which Einstein's geometrodynamics can be uniquely recovered [17,18].…”
Section: Inconsistency Of Non-projectable Horava-lifshitz Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%