2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Approach to Determine Seismic Passive Resistance on Retaining Walls Considering Seismic Waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the train speeds and axle loads keep on increasing, the vibration levels are amplified to a great extent. Energy from the surface sources of vibration mainly propagates in the form of Rayleigh waves, which are confined to a narrow zone near to the surface of the elastic half space (Choudhury and Katdare 2013). In addition, these waves attenuate with distance in a rather slow manner when compared to the Body waves, which predominates near to the source of vibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the train speeds and axle loads keep on increasing, the vibration levels are amplified to a great extent. Energy from the surface sources of vibration mainly propagates in the form of Rayleigh waves, which are confined to a narrow zone near to the surface of the elastic half space (Choudhury and Katdare 2013). In addition, these waves attenuate with distance in a rather slow manner when compared to the Body waves, which predominates near to the source of vibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the M-O method is a very straightforward method to use, it has a limitation of not replicating, and hence simulating, the real field behavior and, therefore, at times overestimating the seismic earth pressure (e.g., Nakamura 2006; Al Atik and Sitar 2009;Jo et al 2017;Bakr and Ahmad 2018a). Extensive efforts have been made to study the seismic earth pressure behind a rigid retaining wall (e.g, Choudhury and Katdare 2013;Tang et al 2014;Dey et al 2017;Zhou et al 2018;Rajesh and Choudhury 2017), whereas little attention has been paid to investigate the development of seismic earth pressure behind a cantilever-type retaining wall. Further, with regards to finding a critical case that needs to be considered for designing a cantilevertype retaining wall under seismic conditions, there are several contradictory evidences in the available literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, determination of elastic strain energy released from microseismic focus has been paid less attention. Current focus energy computation methods applied for microseisms such as the seismic duration and phase integral are mainly referred from the seismology, for which equivalent energy density using the reference equiphase surface is the common approach [14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, it is commonly found that microseismic focus energy obtained from the energy density method is relatively defective and is not reliable enough [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%