New Approach to Determination of Main Solution Taking Dominant of Air Traffic Controller During Flight Level Norms Violation

Reva, Oleksii; Borsuk, S.P.; Mushgyul-Ogli, Bala Mirzayev; Shirin-Ogli, Peyman Mukhtarov

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_12

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus it seems possible to present actual ICAO FS paradigm [4] with leading role of HF influence on decision-making (DM). Figure 1 proposed by authors and cited in various proceedings proves this thesis [6][7][8][9].…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 66%

“…It is found that χ 2 calc: ¼ 201, 412 >>χ 2 α¼1%, k¼36 ¼ 58, 619 which allows to state that RCC indicator value is statistically acceptable. Thus opinions of ATC experts engaged to the research are consistent for (7). It means that GrPS of the type (7) can be used in flight safety management processes or during ATC training procedures.…”

Section: Normative Approach Application To Find Atc Preferences Systementioning

confidence: 80%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Air Traffic Controllers’ Attitude to the Mistakes Hazards during Their Professional Experience

Reva¹,

Nevynitsyn²,

Борсук³

et al. 2020

Safety and Risk Assessment of Civil Aircraft During Operation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Air traffic controllers’ (ATCs) work process can be presented as uninterrupted set of decisions. These decisions occur and are implemented in both clear and stealth forms being influenced a lot. Determined and stochastic risks are especially important in this process. Human factor (HF) effect on flight safety is proven to be better considered through operators’ attitudes toward unsafe acts and conditions. This seamlessly integrates in ICAO safety paradigm. Air traffic controllers’ preferences system (PS) is discussed in regard to typical professional mistakes set. Using paired comparison, normative part of summary hazard and differentiating part of summary hazard, the preferences system of air traffic controllers is received. For the first time, mistakes pair summary hazard is determined on the unique qualimetric 100-point scale. Systems pair has high correlation level according to Spearman coefficient (R = 0.9727). Proposed Kendall rank coefficient outweighs the traditional one twice (Wtraditional = 0.2722, Wproposed = 0.55237). The significance level for all cases is equal to 1%. Multistep procedure of marginal opinions separation is implemented. It increased Kendall rank coefficient value up to Wproposed = 0.7. Survey procedure influenced positively on the ability of mistakes memorization, recognition, and avoidance during simulation training.

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 66%

Section: Normative Approach Application To Find Atc Preferences Systementioning

confidence: 80%

Air Traffic Controllers’ Attitude to the Mistakes Hazards during Their Professional Experience

Reva¹,

Nevynitsyn²,

Борсук³

et al. 2020

Safety and Risk Assessment of Civil Aircraft During Operation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This statement is supported by the determined values of the main decision-making dominants: all considered participants show risk inclination, i.e. a tendency for failure avoidance (Reva et al, 2016;Borsuk, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 71%

Distributions of Air Traffic Control Students’ Attitudes Towards Workload

Borsuk

Reva²

2021

Aviation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mental workload is a well-known concept with a long development history. It can be used to examine students’ attitudes at the end of the educational process and compare them in groups or separately. However, building a continuous workload profile across the range of task complexity increase is still an urgent issue. All four groups of methods used to define mental workload have such flaws for the workload profile construction process as significant time requirements, single value processing and post-processing of the received results. Only one of them can be used without modifications to construct the operator’s attitude chart (profile) regarding the workload range and it doesn’t operate with more reliable absolute values. To resolve this problem, a special workload assessment grid was developed, considering the advantages of a subjective group of methods and seven core characteristics. The reasoning for grid axes choice, threshold values, and question formulation were provided. Statistics were calculated for the full sample, different grades, and educational institutions. Comparison of the received responses with referential values, cross-comparison between institutions and different grades were performed. The results contribute to such important aspects of workload, as redlines, workload profiling, and operator’s comparison.

show abstract

“…Such clarification problem is resolved with application of such ICAO safety concept components as the use of sound SOPs, hazard sources determination, risk factors control, personnel attitude to hazardous actions and conditions, etc. [18]. Considering the "attitude to risky actions or conditions" as the leading inbound marker to the problem, it is regarded as an explanatory link for flight safety within the human factor.…”

Section: Risk Tolerabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

ICAO Risk Tolerability Solution via Complex Indicators of Air Traffic Control Students’ Attitude to Risk

Борсук¹,

Reva²

2020

Risk Assessment in Air Traffic Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The solution of the ICAO risk tolerability is proposed via complex indicators of air traffic control students' attitude to risk. Physically tangible rates and characteristics are used to determine air traffic control students' attitude to risk levels during flight separation minima violation. The following features of human factors expression are taken as corresponding indicators: main decision-making dominants, aspiration levels, and parameters of the fuzzy risk estimates. The final solution is received with the help of a multiplicative approach. Indicators developed in the paper are proposed to be received with special survey procedure and further results processing and normalization. The explained method is applicable for both acting air traffic controllers and students of the corresponding educational majors.

show abstract

New Approach to Determination of Main Solution Taking Dominant of Air Traffic Controller During Flight Level Norms Violation

Cited by 8 publications

References 1 publication

Air Traffic Controllers’ Attitude to the Mistakes Hazards during Their Professional Experience

Air Traffic Controllers’ Attitude to the Mistakes Hazards during Their Professional Experience

Distributions of Air Traffic Control Students’ Attitudes Towards Workload

ICAO Risk Tolerability Solution via Complex Indicators of Air Traffic Control Students’ Attitude to Risk

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About