2021
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfab062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Approach Methodology for Assessing Inhalation Risks of a Contact Respiratory Cytotoxicant: Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Aerosol Dosimetry Modeling for Cross-Species and In Vitro Comparisons

Abstract: Regulatory agencies are considering alternative approaches to assessing inhalation toxicity that utilizes in vitro studies with human cells and in silico modeling in lieu of additional animal studies. In support of this goal, computational fluid-particle dynamics (CFPD) models were developed to estimate site-specific deposition of inhaled aerosols containing the fungicide, chlorothalonil, in the rat and human for comparisons to prior rat inhalation studies and new human in vitro studies. Under bioassay conditi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, as part of a registration review, a NAM approach was used to evaluate inhalation exposures for the fungicide chlorothalonil, which is a respiratory contact irritant ( EPA, 2021c ). The approach utilizes an in vitro assay to derive an inhalation point of departure in conjunction with in silico dosimetry modeling to calculate human equivalent concentrations for risk assessment ( Corley et al, 2021 ; McGee Hargrove et al, 2021 ). The approach, which was reviewed and supported by a FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel ( EPA, 2018a ), provided an opportunity to overcome challenges associated with testing respiratory irritants, while also incorporating human relevant information.…”
Section: Pesticides and Plant Protection Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as part of a registration review, a NAM approach was used to evaluate inhalation exposures for the fungicide chlorothalonil, which is a respiratory contact irritant ( EPA, 2021c ). The approach utilizes an in vitro assay to derive an inhalation point of departure in conjunction with in silico dosimetry modeling to calculate human equivalent concentrations for risk assessment ( Corley et al, 2021 ; McGee Hargrove et al, 2021 ). The approach, which was reviewed and supported by a FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel ( EPA, 2018a ), provided an opportunity to overcome challenges associated with testing respiratory irritants, while also incorporating human relevant information.…”
Section: Pesticides and Plant Protection Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…simple binary approach (i.e., toxic vs. non-toxic), the concordance was below 85% [28-32 Thus, it is unrealistic to expect NAMs to achieve a higher concordance level than the in trinsic concordance exhibited by the in vivo test. Ongoing work for skin and eye irritation skin sensitization, and acute inhalation now incorporates human biological relevance int NAM assessment rather than a direct comparison with in vivo toxicology study resu [5,33,34].…”
Section: Opportunities: Addressing the Variability Of In Vivo Data Wh...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first used CFD and PBPK to model localized cell-and tissue-specific internal doses of reactive aldehydes, allowing hazard ranking of tobacco smoke constituents [64]. The second case study focused on reducing and replacing sub chronic (90-day) animal inhalation studies for pesticide aerosols with realistic human exposure characterizations, in vitro toxicity studies with human cells, and kinetic modeling of aerosol dosimetry as a follow-on for short-term toxicity studies [5,68]. Here, CFD with muco-ciliary clearance modeling was used to calculate region-specific retained doses and risk assessment, enabling a waiver for a 90-day inhalation study of chlorothalonil required for the pesticide registration renewal.…”
Section: Nam-03: Inhalation Exposure Modeling For Assessment Of Aeros...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations