2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-021-02996-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New approach for the rational selection of markers to identify botulinum toxins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another drawback of the MBA is the impossibility of discriminating between mosaic types and the partial cross-reactivity of type C or D antitoxin when diagnosing mosaic botulism. A variety of techniques to detect BoNTs have been developed, including ELISAs, enzymatic methods based upon BoNT cleavage of synthetic peptides followed by different detection of the specific product, or cell-based assay [103][104][105][106][107][108]. These techniques, although promising, have, however, not been validated for the diagnosis of equine botulism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another drawback of the MBA is the impossibility of discriminating between mosaic types and the partial cross-reactivity of type C or D antitoxin when diagnosing mosaic botulism. A variety of techniques to detect BoNTs have been developed, including ELISAs, enzymatic methods based upon BoNT cleavage of synthetic peptides followed by different detection of the specific product, or cell-based assay [103][104][105][106][107][108]. These techniques, although promising, have, however, not been validated for the diagnosis of equine botulism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several alternative laboratory tests to detect BoNTs have been developed, including ELISAs, enzymatic methods based upon BoNT cleavage of synthetic peptides followed by differential detection of the specific product by spectrometry, or cell-based assay. 4,6,12,39,42,43,47,49 These techniques, although promising, have, however, not been validated for the diagnosis of fish botulism.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is sensitive, but expensive and time consuming (1-7 days), lacks standardization, and can't meet rapid demands (3). Other detection methods include HPLC, MS, and ELISA (7)(8)(9). However, while these methods are suitable for detection of toxins in buffer or purified toxins, most of them have not been proven suitable for detection in complex matrix samples such as food, serum, and more.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%