2013
DOI: 10.1111/echo.12406
|Get access via publisher |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

New Approach for Rotational Dyssynchrony Using Three‐Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography

Abstract: Left ventricular (LV) twist can be evaluated using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) by analyzing difference between apical and basal rotation. However, it is unable to evaluate global rotational dyssynchrony because it cannot assess mid-wall rotation. Recently developed three-dimensional STE (3DSTE) can investigate LV global rotational dyssynchrony. In this study, we investigated the role of torsion on the long-term effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using 3DSTE. We eva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is still uncertain what is the best echocardiographic index of cardiac asynchrony, although recently STE and 3D echocardiography have provided reliable and more predictive data than those used prior to these innovative imaging modalities (16). LV myocardial torsional mechanics are known to be compromised in HF patients (17,18,19), though an increasing interest for its role in assessing improvement to CRT is recently noticed (20). The reasons of this investigating hesitancy might be the low reproducibility of measurements, the complex helical ventricular architecture and contraction and the different vectors' software tools that frequently provide contradictory data of identical phenomena.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is still uncertain what is the best echocardiographic index of cardiac asynchrony, although recently STE and 3D echocardiography have provided reliable and more predictive data than those used prior to these innovative imaging modalities (16). LV myocardial torsional mechanics are known to be compromised in HF patients (17,18,19), though an increasing interest for its role in assessing improvement to CRT is recently noticed (20). The reasons of this investigating hesitancy might be the low reproducibility of measurements, the complex helical ventricular architecture and contraction and the different vectors' software tools that frequently provide contradictory data of identical phenomena.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TDI is considered to represent the amount of rotational energy lost by dyssynchrony. 10 Finally, LV torsion curves were filtered by polynomial interpolation and analytically derived to measure the untwisting rate (UTR) value and recoil rate (i.e., the slope of the linear regression of recoil (i.e., untwisting) vs. time in early diastole). 18 Receiver-operating curves (ROC) were used to assess the capacity of a given measurement to assess the presence/ absence of the LV remodeling response at follow-up.…”
Section: Optimized Lead Position Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting aspect to this study is the relation between torsional regional mechanics and the degree of dyssynchrony of dysfunctional ventricles. Retracing Lee et al's study, 10 we analyzed the TDI and its variations in our population with CRT-off/on. Unfortunately, we did not find any significant interaction for this parameter between the 2 patients' groups, although we could detect an overall significant reduction in dyssynchrony with CRT-on as compared with CRT-off (P=0.001, Table 2).…”
Section: Torsion Tdi and Site Of Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its angle-independent nature, STE can provide more accurate assessments of local and global myocardial function, making it highly valuable for detecting viable myocardium. The combination of STE and LDDSE further enhances the sensitivity and speci city, maximizing the detection of viable myocardium (9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%