2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.joes.2019.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New applications of the two variable (G′/G, 1/G)-expansion method for closed form traveling wave solutions of integro-differential equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, the values of the time-fractional order used for the following simulations are α = 1, 0.7 and 0.3. Solutions (41) and (46) of Equation ( 1) and solution (65) of Equation (2) are selected to present in terms of 3D, 2D, and contour plots according to the values of α. All of the 3D solution graphs of ( 1) and ( 2) are portrayed on the domain {(x, y, t) : 0 ≤ x, t ≤ 10, y = 1} and {(x, y, z, t) : 0 ≤ x, t ≤ 10, y = z = 1}, respectively.…”
Section: Graphical Representations Of the Selected Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Particularly, the values of the time-fractional order used for the following simulations are α = 1, 0.7 and 0.3. Solutions (41) and (46) of Equation ( 1) and solution (65) of Equation (2) are selected to present in terms of 3D, 2D, and contour plots according to the values of α. All of the 3D solution graphs of ( 1) and ( 2) are portrayed on the domain {(x, y, t) : 0 ≤ x, t ≤ 10, y = 1} and {(x, y, z, t) : 0 ≤ x, t ≤ 10, y = z = 1}, respectively.…”
Section: Graphical Representations Of the Selected Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By classifying the shapes of the 3D and 2D graphs in Figure 1, it can be identified that solution ( 41) is a singular singlesoliton solution that is a solitary wave with discontinuous derivatives occurring at some domain regions, as observed in the contour plots of Figure 1. In addition, Figure 2a-c shows the 3D, 2D, and contour plots for solution (46), respectively, when α = 1. Figure 2d-f and Figure 2g-i are drawn in a similar manner to the above plots except using α = 0.7 and α = 0.3, respectively.…”
Section: Graphical Representations Of the Selected Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Physicists, engineers and mathematicians have established precise solutions for the NLEEs that transform into a key task in the analysis of nonlinear physical incidents. Generally, there is no single approach to resolve all sorts of NLEEs, and a variety of scientific groups have successfully established many techniques, including the method of extended tanh-function [1], the method of tanh function [2,3], the method of sine-cosine [4], the method of modified extended tanh function [5], the method of exp (−ϕ(ξ ))-expansion [6], the method of exp-function [7], the method of Backlund transformation [8], the method of Miura transformation [9], the method of extended F-expansion [10], the method of improved F-expansion [11], the method of ( ′/ / G G G , 1 )-expansion [18], the method of (G′/G)expansion [12][13][14][15], the method of new auxiliary equation [16], the method of auxiliary equation [17], the method of Kudryashov [18][19][20][21], the method of modified Kudryashov [29], the method of extended trial function [31], the method of variational iteration [32], the method of modified simple equation (MSE) [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], extended modified direct algebraic method, extended mapping method and Seadawy techniques to find solutions for some nonlinear partial differential equations [33][34]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…expansion method [30,31], the 1 G expansion method [32,33], the decomposition Sumudu-like-integral transform method [34], and the inverse scattering method [35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%