2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New and conventional pore size tests in virus-removing membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MS2 is a single-stranded RNA virus with a diameter of 25-27 nm and an IEP of 3.9 [12,37]. PhiX174 is a single-stranded DNA virus with a diameter of 26-32 nm and an IEP of 6.6 [12,37]. These viruses belong to the smallest viruses and therefore, filtrations based on size exclusion principle can be ideally investigated.…”
Section: Virus Retention Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MS2 is a single-stranded RNA virus with a diameter of 25-27 nm and an IEP of 3.9 [12,37]. PhiX174 is a single-stranded DNA virus with a diameter of 26-32 nm and an IEP of 6.6 [12,37]. These viruses belong to the smallest viruses and therefore, filtrations based on size exclusion principle can be ideally investigated.…”
Section: Virus Retention Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…membranes). Filtration is based on size exclusion effects and therefore, contaminants which are larger than the membrane pore size can be effectively retained [12,13]. A virus removal using ceramic filters made of raw materials (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction of the particles with bacterial DNA may result in bacteriostatic action, preventing cell reproduction (3). Antibacterial properties of AgNPs can be shown against a large spectrum of microorganisms including gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (5), fungi (6) and viruses (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IEP value of MS2 bacteriophage in different environments, based on the averaging of 10 measurements, shows a mean IEP value of 3.5 ± 0.6 and with the discrepancy in IEP (ΔIEP) of 1.8 from 2.2 to 4.0 [34]. Recent studies by Duek et al [35] and Chrysikopoulos et al [36] determined the alteration of the IEP by a change in water chemistry (e.g., ionic strength or ionic composition) with IEP of the former case in the range from less than 2 at ionic strengths of 0.0 mM and 2.6 mM to IEP of 4.4 in the latter case that was measured in double distilled water. In the case where clean colloidal particles are suspended in absolute pure water, the point of zero charge (PZC), which is characteristic to the particle's surface, can be determined.…”
Section: Virus and Bacteria Isoelectric Pointsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The IEP and the PZC do not necessarily differ in the presence of monovalent ions; however, the PZC is very difficult to measure experimentally [34]. MS2 (ATCC 15597-B1) and fr (ATCC 15767-B1) bacteriophages are icosahedral in shape with a diameter of 26-27 nm [35] and 19 nm [37], respectively. The isoelectric point of fr bacteriophage is 8.9-9.0 [37].…”
Section: Virus and Bacteria Isoelectric Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%