2021
DOI: 10.31582/rmag.mg.58.1.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New age constraints on the Late Cretaceous lower Williams Fork Formation, Coal Canyon, Colorado

Abstract: The precise age of terrestrial sediments in the Late Cretaceous Williams Fork Formation of western Colorado is poorly constrained due to a paucity of radiometric data. Sanidine and zircon dating of a volcanic ash encased in coal (i.e., the Coal Canyon ash) within the Cameo-Wheeler coal zone of the lower Williams Fork Formation in Coal Canyon, Colorado provides an important new age constraint for the southwestern Piceance Basin. A 10-30 cm thick, light gray, clayey mudstone encased in coal was sampled for b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distal equivalents show increasing thickness, but lower net‐to‐gross ratio and limited connectivity of channels (López & Steel, 2015). In the Sand Wash Basin in northwestern Colorado, the Canyon Creek Member is thought to be equivalent to the Williams Fork Formation, based on ammonite control, as well as sanidine and zircon dating (Cobban et al., 2006; Minor et al., 2021; Walker et al., 2021). The Williams Fork Formation contains coastal plain deposits as well as the shoreline sandstones of the Trout Creek and Twentymile members (López & Steel, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distal equivalents show increasing thickness, but lower net‐to‐gross ratio and limited connectivity of channels (López & Steel, 2015). In the Sand Wash Basin in northwestern Colorado, the Canyon Creek Member is thought to be equivalent to the Williams Fork Formation, based on ammonite control, as well as sanidine and zircon dating (Cobban et al., 2006; Minor et al., 2021; Walker et al., 2021). The Williams Fork Formation contains coastal plain deposits as well as the shoreline sandstones of the Trout Creek and Twentymile members (López & Steel, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertebrate fauna of the Williams Fork Formation is considered as stratigraphically equivalent to (Fowler 2017;Fowler and Freedman Fowler 2020) or slightly younger than (cf. Walker et al 2021) the Hunter Wash Member of the Kirtland Formation, New Mexico. A sister taxon of Tyrannosauridae, Bistahieversor sealeyi, occurs in this member (Carr and Williamson 2010), but UCM 87636 is distinguishable from this taxon by the aforementioned morphology of the proximal articular surface (Carr 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ammonite Didymoceras cheyennense Meek and Hayden, 1856 (74.60-74.21 Ma) occurs in the lower part of the Williams Fork Formation (e.g., Fowler 2017), and Diem and Archibald (2005) 39 Ar age of 73.10±0.12 Ma for the Coal Canyon ash of the lower Williams Fork Formation, which they interpreted as coeval to the Yampa bed. Walker et al (2021) noted that the result of 40 Ar/ 39 Ar sanidine analyses is preferable as this is based on higher precision analyses, and suggested the Coal Canyon ash may correlate with the Baculites reesidei ammonite Zone (72.94±0.45 Ma). These data suggest the vertebrate fauna of the Williams Fork Formation, including the tyrannosaurid taxon represented by UCM 87636, likely dates to the latest Campanian.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Late Cretaceous Western Interior Basin (WIB) of North America possesses the highest diversity of hadrosaurids in the fossil record, and the past decade has provided discoveries that continue to refine the spatiotemporal resolution of hadrosaurid biodiversity and clarify the phylogenetic relationships of this clade. We present a preliminary cranial osteology and phylogenetic placement of a new hadrosaurid dinosaur from the Late Campanian Williams Fork Formation ($75-72 Myr Walker et al, 2021]) of northwestern Colorado. The specimen (CNFM-001) was recovered from a sand-rich environment, with localized sections that range from loosely compacted sand grains to hardened concretions and pebble-sized rip-up clasts.…”
Section: Mass Properties Of Dinosaurs From the Late Maastrichtian Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%