New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR‐V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR

Abstract

PurposeTo assess the noise characteristics of the new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR‐V) in comparison to ASiR.MethodsA water phantom was acquired with common clinical scanning parameters, at five different levels of CTDIvol. Images were reconstructed with different kernels (STD, SOFT, and BONE), different IR levels (40%, 60%, and 100%) and different slice thickness (ST) (0.625 and 2.5 mm), both for ASiR‐V and ASiR. Noise properties were investigated and noise power spectrum (NPS) was evaluated.ResultsASiR‐V significantly reduced noise relative to FBP: noise reduction was in the range 23%–60% for a 0.625 mm ST and 12%–64% for the 2.5 mm ST. Above 2 mGy, noise reduction for ASiR‐V had no dependence on dose. Noise reduction for ASIR‐V has dependence on ST, being greater for STD and SOFT kernels at 2.5 mm. For the STD kernel ASiR‐V has greater noise reduction for both ST, if compared to ASiR. For the SOFT kernel, results varies according to dose and ST, while for BONE kernel ASIR‐V shows less noise reduction. NPS for CT Revolution has dose dependent behavior at lower doses. NPS for ASIR‐V and ASiR is similar, showing a shift toward lower frequencies as the IR level increases for STD and SOFT kernels. The NPS is different between ASiR‐V and ASIR with BONE kernel. NPS for ASiR‐V appears to be ST dependent, having a shift toward lower frequencies for 2.5 mm ST.ConclusionsASiR‐V showed greater noise reduction than ASiR for STD and SOFT kernels, while keeping the same NPS. For the BONE kernel, ASiR‐V presents a completely different behavior, with less noise reduction and modified NPS. Noise properties of the ASiR‐V are dependent on reconstruction slice thickness. The noise properties of ASiR‐V suggest the need for further measurements and efforts to establish new CT protocols to optimize clinical imaging.

Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for computed tomography of the spine

“…4). Such a noise reduction effect is well known 18 and can be understood from our z-NPS curve (Fig. 3).…”

Task-Based Model Observer Assessment of A Partial Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in Thoracic Oncologic Multidetector CT

“…However, they evaluated only two ASiR-V levels and did not investigate the effects of sharp kernels, nor compared their advanced physical metric results with clinical MDCT findings. Moreover, De Marco and Origgi recently reported in a further phantom study that the noise reduction potential of ASiR-V depended on the reconstruction section thickness and kernel, as well as the dose level below 2 mGy 40 . Interestingly, they found a dose-dependent behaviour of normalised NPS below 4 mGy for both smooth and sharp kernels.…”

Value of using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) technology in pediatric head CT dose reduction

“…Moreover, many studies mentioned that the use of high levels of ASIR algorithm reconstruction yields softened resulting CT images with concern that fine anatomical features may be obscured [6,7,[15][16][17][18]. However, the innovated third generation of ASIR, ASIR-V has provided better noise reduction than the older ASIR generations, with resultant better image resolution [14,19]. This study aimed at quantitative and qualitative evaluation of reduced dose head CT examination with different low mA and ASIR 60% and 80% algorithm reconstruction compared to standard dose non-ASIR reconstructed head CT examination in pediatric patients.…”