2005
DOI: 10.1587/elex.2.554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New adaptive partial distortion search algorithm for block motion estimation

Abstract: Abstract:A new and fast motion-estimation algorithm based on partial block distortion using sorted significant features including bitplane and mean is proposed. The proposed algorithm can obtain relatively accurate motion vectors with a reduced computational load. Simulation results show that the proposed method achieves its MSE performance very close to the full search method, while requiring only 6-8% of the computation needed by the full search. Furthermore, the performance of our method is better than othe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare the performance of the proposed algorithm with the NPDS-based algorithms, we also simulated other algorithms including FSA, NPDS [8], NA-NPDS [10], and PEP-NPDS [11]. For a fair comparison, these algorithms adopt 4 4 u sub-blockbased scan and are carried out under the same conditions.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To compare the performance of the proposed algorithm with the NPDS-based algorithms, we also simulated other algorithms including FSA, NPDS [8], NA-NPDS [10], and PEP-NPDS [11]. For a fair comparison, these algorithms adopt 4 4 u sub-blockbased scan and are carried out under the same conditions.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the reason why the TSB-NPDS algorithm can quickly and exactly find out the best result when compared to other NPDS-based algorithms. Consequently, the proposed TSB-NPDS algorithm can obtain better PSNR quality than that of the NPDS [8], NA-NPDS [10], and PEP-NPDS [11]. In addition, we also compare the computational reduction in terms of the average number of checking 4 4 u sub-blocks per MB ( ave N ) and speedup ratios by other NPDS-based algorithms.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations