New Actors, New Political Spaces, Same Divided City? Reflections on Poverty and the Politics of Urban Development in Salvador, Bahia

Abstract

Critics of Lula's administration argue that business has greatest weight in setting its priorities and that anti-poverty programmes based on conditional cash transfers have little long-term structural impact on social inequality. Yet the coherence and scope of these programmes is now an order of magnitude greater than under the previous administration, their impact on poverty has so far proved sustainable, and poor people themselves often express satisfaction with them. This paper argues that critics who see retreat from universal social benefits as undermining political commitment to reducing social inequality underestimate the countervailing force of the capacity of some poor communities to seize the opportunities that have emerged to oblige politicians to reengage with both poverty and the roots of social injustice. Analyses that focus solely on economic precariousness and the decline of sociability are ignoring the ways in which third sector activity and social change have produced new kinds of political actors and group identities, particularly amongst young people, that may be ambivalent in nature but indicate that levels of politicisation are not being reduced. Nevertheless, optimism about poverty reduction needs to be tempered by appreciation of how problems of violence and insecurity also shape state interventions in, and in some cases virtual withdrawal from, poor communities. The rationality of party politics may have a more negative effect on securing the longer-term patterns of public investment required to reduce social inequality than it has had on the administration of the Bolsa Familia programme. In the case of Salvador, Bahia, where urban real estate interests remain as politically influential as ever, change will depend on the strength of pressures from above and below on municipal and state governments, but although anti-poverty programmes help keep people invested in the political system, they can also increase aspirations for greater economic and racial equality.

The postneoliberal fabulation of power: On statecraft, precarious infrastructures, and public mobilization in Brazil

“…Brazilian state policy and political discourse emphasize the government's active role in guaranteeing the rights of citizenship and in eliminating poverty through, for example, cash transfers (Gledhill and Hita ). But promoting a market‐friendly environment remains a central priority—“A rich country is a country without poverty,” as an early slogan of President Dilma Rousseff proclaimed.…”

Extralegal Agency and the Search for Safety in Northeast Brazil

“…Bairro das Pombas, with a population of around sixty thousand, forms part of the urban periphery -or favela zone -of the predominantly AfroBrazilian city of Salvador, Bahia. Favela zones are made possible by extralegality -for example, by unofficial tolerance of squatter settlements and pirated utilities (Gledhill and Hita 2009;Holston 2008;Telles and Hirata 2007). Qualities of Trisa's home indicate robust extra legal capaci ties of some social actors in particular, capacities developed through entanglements with police and prisons.…”

The perversity of the ‘Citizenship Game’: Slum-upgrading in the urban periphery of Recife, Brazil

“…According to official documents, Prometro´pole's aims are to address infrastructural problems in the city and 'to improve the wealth and well-being of the urban poor who will benefit from a housing program that gives them access to a risk-free home, which meets liveability norms and which are supplied with basic services' (World Bank, 2003: 39). What is less openly expressed is that slum-upgrading programmes also aim to resolve the evils of insecurity (Gledhill and Hita, 2009). Slums are considered a security problem not only because of their inhabitants, who are seen by many as 'public enemies' (Scheper-Hughes, 2006) but also in terms of their spatial layout.…”