Proceedings of 31st International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory LATTICE 2013 — PoS(LATTICE 2013) 2014
DOI: 10.22323/1.187.0121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New actions for minimally doubled fermions and their counterterms

Abstract: Minimally doubled fermions provide a cheap and convenient way of simulating quarks which preserve chiral symmetry. It has been established that two actions of this kind (known as Boriçi-Creutz and Karsten-Wilczek) require the tuning of three counterterms in order to be properly renormalized. Here we construct some more general minimally doubled actions and investigate the properties of their counterterms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One could therefore argue that the reduction in (hard to control) systematic error is paid for by a corresponding increase in (expensive to reduce) statistical error. • To have a further handle on the precise behaviour of the excited-state contributions, we have also considered two-state fits [4,7], i.e. we have explicitly fit G eff X (Q 2 ,t,t s ) to leading excitedstate contributions of the form (2.1) with ∆ = m π , ∆ = 2m π , both as a function of t, t s − t at each t s separately, and as a function of t s , t at all t s simultaneously.…”
Section: Excited-state Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could therefore argue that the reduction in (hard to control) systematic error is paid for by a corresponding increase in (expensive to reduce) statistical error. • To have a further handle on the precise behaviour of the excited-state contributions, we have also considered two-state fits [4,7], i.e. we have explicitly fit G eff X (Q 2 ,t,t s ) to leading excitedstate contributions of the form (2.1) with ∆ = m π , ∆ = 2m π , both as a function of t, t s − t at each t s separately, and as a function of t s , t at all t s simultaneously.…”
Section: Excited-state Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%