1994
DOI: 10.2307/2505381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Never Again" is Now

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 For, contrary to popular belief, these rules are not simply a question of ethics, but also one of concrete needs and interests behind specific ways in which individuals and communities refer to the Holocaust. Eventually, as Hans Kellner (1994) points out, the memory of the Shoah, despite conveying respect for the suffering of the victims, does not serve them but the contemporary users of that memory.…”
Section: Vera Gran: the Incorrigible?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 For, contrary to popular belief, these rules are not simply a question of ethics, but also one of concrete needs and interests behind specific ways in which individuals and communities refer to the Holocaust. Eventually, as Hans Kellner (1994) points out, the memory of the Shoah, despite conveying respect for the suffering of the victims, does not serve them but the contemporary users of that memory.…”
Section: Vera Gran: the Incorrigible?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wbrew pozorom są one bowiem funkcją nie wyłącznie etyki, lecz także konkretnych potrzeb i interesów indywidualnych oraz społecznych stojących za określonym odwoływaniem się do Zagłady. Wszak, jak zauważa Hans Kellner (1994), pamięć Holokaustu, choć jest między innymi wyrazem szacunku wobec ofiar i ich cierpienia, nie służy im, lecz współczesnym, którzy ją kultywują.…”
Section: Niepoprawna: Wiera Granunclassified
“…The argument, as noted by Jenkins (2003; Brown 2005; Iggers 2005), to be sure, is not that the past never occurred or existed; it happened, but exists today only as representation, in its specific form made through the efforts of those who define it – and, those representations are highly contingent, fragile, political and fluid. Historians from these traditions have stressed that history is always interpretation of the past and thus must necessarily be plural in representation (Braun 1997; Ermarth 1992; Jenkins 1999; Kellner 1997; White 1973, 1985). Through plurality, the hope has been to release history’s emancipatory potential (Jenkins 1999).…”
Section: The Politics Of Representation: Realism and Relativismmentioning
confidence: 99%