2007
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.102822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutrophil Traction Stresses are Concentrated in the Uropod during Migration

Abstract: We find that in contrast to strongly adherent, slow moving cells such as fibroblasts, neutrophils exert contractile stresses largely in the rear of the cell (uropod) relative to the direction of motion. Rather than the leading edge pulling the cell, the rear is both anchoring the cell and the area in which the contractile forces are concentrated. These tractions rapidly reorient themselves during a turn, on a timescale of seconds to minutes, and their repositioning precedes and sets the direction of motion dur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
128
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This latter observation is consistent with previous reports of T-cell crawling, showing that adhesion and migration properties are mediated by integrin/ ICAM binding and affinity regulation in the front and central body 14 . In contrast, the former observation of non-adherence of the cell rear is surprising relative to existing paradigms on cell motility: for mesenchymatous cells, cell rear is clearly adherent and requires strong actomyosin traction to detach 15 , and for amoeboid cells, actomyosin traction is also reported to be concentrated in uropods 16 . Nevertheless, the non-adherence of lymphocytes uropods is directly relevant for flow-guided migration, as it allows the fast rotation and orientation of uropods with flow in the plane of the substrate, which is similar to a free-rotating wind vane (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This latter observation is consistent with previous reports of T-cell crawling, showing that adhesion and migration properties are mediated by integrin/ ICAM binding and affinity regulation in the front and central body 14 . In contrast, the former observation of non-adherence of the cell rear is surprising relative to existing paradigms on cell motility: for mesenchymatous cells, cell rear is clearly adherent and requires strong actomyosin traction to detach 15 , and for amoeboid cells, actomyosin traction is also reported to be concentrated in uropods 16 . Nevertheless, the non-adherence of lymphocytes uropods is directly relevant for flow-guided migration, as it allows the fast rotation and orientation of uropods with flow in the plane of the substrate, which is similar to a free-rotating wind vane (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The physiological benefit of flow orientation is currently unknown for lymphocytes and more generally for neutrophils 16 , endothelial cells 9 or amoebae 23 . The fact that neutrophils crawl downstream 16 and T lymphocytes upstream 4 while migrating on the same adhesive ligand, challenges the idea of a universal flowguided mechanism selected to favour extravasation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, less is known about how the back of the cell may regulate signaling at the front and modulate cell polarity. There is evidence to support a role for the uropod in regulating cell polarity (Lee et al, 2004), and recent studies suggest that the uropod provides an area where contractile stresses are concentrated (Smith et al, 2007) and may play a more active role in cell motility by regulating integrin clustering through WASP (Zhang et al, 2006). This raises the intriguing possibility that the cell rear may be an active signaling module that regulates cell polarity and provides positive feedback to the front of the cell during directed cell migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, we found that cross-linking of surface expressed CD81 and CD63 with specific mAb significantly enhanced migration of NK cells toward various inflammatory and lymphoid chemokines/cytokines. In contrast, Ab directed against CD9 and CD151 did not affect NK cell motility.Formation of an asymmetric front-rear axis is an essential requirement for efficient directional lymphocyte movement [24,25,29,30]. This polarization segregates two cell compartments with specific properties, composition, and functions: the leading edge at the front and the uropod at the rear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%