1979
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.32.1.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutrophil cytochemistry in bacterial infection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its early detection is difficult, however, since clinical signs are often masked by neutropenia, and bacteriological culture usually requires 24 hours. Rapid screening tests for infection, such as neutrophil cytochemistry or the Limulus test for endotoxaemia, have not yet proved sufficiently reliable when applied to the individual patient (Martinez-G et al, 1973, Steigbigel et al, 1974Mackie et al, 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its early detection is difficult, however, since clinical signs are often masked by neutropenia, and bacteriological culture usually requires 24 hours. Rapid screening tests for infection, such as neutrophil cytochemistry or the Limulus test for endotoxaemia, have not yet proved sufficiently reliable when applied to the individual patient (Martinez-G et al, 1973, Steigbigel et al, 1974Mackie et al, 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than indicating the presence of one particular enzyme, the cellular reaction to CAE represents the activity of multiple esterase enzymes (Li et al 1973). Increased stain reaction to CAE has been noted in studies of human patients with local and systemic bacterial infections (Wozniak et al 1978;Mackie et al 1979). The increased stain uptake observed in the neutrophils of these patients was believed to be due to an increase in membrane permeability after exposure to bacterial products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%