2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.04.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutronic performance of uranium nitride composite fuels in a PWR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although U 3 Si 2 -FeCrAl system has less variation in reactivity from low to high burnup at constant boron concentration, the boron coefficient is also less negative due to the hardened spectrum, which is also presented in UO 2 -FeCrAl combination [30] and UN-U 3 Si 2 combination [31]. Higher boron concentration is needed at the BOC for critical condition, which is presented in I 2 S-LWR [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although U 3 Si 2 -FeCrAl system has less variation in reactivity from low to high burnup at constant boron concentration, the boron coefficient is also less negative due to the hardened spectrum, which is also presented in UO 2 -FeCrAl combination [30] and UN-U 3 Si 2 combination [31]. Higher boron concentration is needed at the BOC for critical condition, which is presented in I 2 S-LWR [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that use of U 3 Si 5 as a reactor fuel could only be broadly envisioned if high enrichment was allowed for specialty reactor designs, or as a second fissile phase in a composite fuel where a companion high density fuel would increase the total uranium loading to necessary levels. The primary advantages of U 3 Si 5 identified to date are the neutronic similarity of a UN-U 3 Si 5 composite to reference UO 2 [2], which would minimize LWR operational differences from the viewpoint of the reactor operator, and greatly improved oxidation resistance compared to the more commonly cited U-Si fuel candidate, U 3 Si 2 [3]. Although at this point such a fuel is hypothetical, reactor performance modeling would undoubtedly be an early investment to explore neutronics and burnup as a function of possible reactor designs, fuel loading, and many other parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context the differences between the configurations were the cladding material, fuel pellet diameter, and cladding thickness. The details of a similar methodology are outlined in Brown et al (2014) in which different lattice configurations are used, along with a set of cross section branch parameters (fuel temperature, moderator density, moderator temperature, soluble boron concentration, and control rod) that bound hot zero power conditions. For each of the candidate configurations, an equilibrium cycle core model was generated using the Purdue Advanced Reactor Core Simulator (PARCS) (Downar et al 2002), the US NRC's reactor-core simulator.…”
Section: /55mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1. One-quarter-assembly geometry used for generation of the few-group parameters for the reactor core models (Brown et al 2014).…”
Section: /55mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation