2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutronic modeling of debris beds for a criticality evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and the greater resonance escape probability p P [-] (due to the self-shielding effect from the Structure-Fuel-Structure spatial arrangement [49]), the value of eff k in the Mixed model was still higher than the Homogeneous model after particle redistribution, in which the results are listed in Table 7.…”
Section: Criticality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and the greater resonance escape probability p P [-] (due to the self-shielding effect from the Structure-Fuel-Structure spatial arrangement [49]), the value of eff k in the Mixed model was still higher than the Homogeneous model after particle redistribution, in which the results are listed in Table 7.…”
Section: Criticality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the Mixed model also exhibited a greater decreased range in the debris bed height than the Homogeneous model during the particle redistribution (Figure 10b); therefore, the PC effect in the Mixed model caused a higher decreased range of k e f f than the Homogeneous model after particle redistribution, as in Figure 10c. Nevertheless, since the PC effect in the Mixed model also contributes to the higher thermal utilization factor [-] (due to the higher concentrated fissile material in Fuel particles) and the greater resonance escape probability P p [-] (due to the self-shielding effect from the Structure-Fuel-Structure spatial arrangement [49]), the value of k e f f in the Mixed model was still higher than the Homogeneous model after particle redistribution, in which the results are listed in Table 7.…”
Section: Criticality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers at the University of Stuttgart are currently studying the effect of the corium model used in neutronic analysis of corium-water systems on the calculation results (Freiría López et al 2018López et al , 2019. In their works, they compare the homogeneous, heterogeneous-network and heterogeneous model with a random distribution of corium particles with the abstract most reliable computational model.…”
Section: Approaches To Neutronic Modeling Of Systems With Coriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of these simplifications to model the porous structure of debris beds was extensively investigated in a previous study [19], where the influence of the particle shape, size, and spatial distribution on the criticality was analyzed. Finally, it was concluded that either a body centered cubic (BCC) or a FCC lattice of monosized spherical particles can be a very suitable model for the criticality evaluation of debris beds if an adequate particle size (equivalent diameter, d eq ) is chosen, providing accurate results with a reasonable modeling and computational effort.…”
Section: Geometrical Model Of the Debris Bedmentioning
confidence: 99%