2016
DOI: 10.3390/condmat1010010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron Study of Multilevel Structures of Diamond Gels

Abstract: Abstract:The structure of a hydrogel consisting of diamond nanoparticles formed by the explosion method has been studied. Small angle neutron scattering has been used as a method for characterization of the gel. Joint approaches for data analysis in reciprocal and direct space have been developed to restore a multilevel structure. The pristine hydrogel of positively charged diamond particles (~5 nm in size, concentration~5 wt %), even by four-fold dilution below its formation critical point, (C*~4 wt %) retain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphology of DND obtained from the recovered detonation can be directly compared with that obtained in situ by comparing the general features of the USAXS in Figure a with those obtained by TR-SAXS (Figure ). Both the USAXS and TR-SAXS contain a broad Guinier knee that is preceded by a power-law-like decay in intensity and is followed by a steep decay that deviates from Porod decay, similar to the behavior previously reported in the literature. , While it is common in SAS analysis to simply fit a power-law decay to this region and draw conclusions about the surface from the exponent, a distinct approach is adopted in this paper: the deviation from Porod decay is addressed first, followed by a comprehensive model that accounts for both the particle size and surface. To demonstrate the deviation from Porod scattering, the high- q portion of the TR-SAXS data was fit to the equation where the prefactor, B , and flat background, b , are varied to fit the intensity in the q -range: 0.12 Å –1 < q < 0.4 Å –1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The morphology of DND obtained from the recovered detonation can be directly compared with that obtained in situ by comparing the general features of the USAXS in Figure a with those obtained by TR-SAXS (Figure ). Both the USAXS and TR-SAXS contain a broad Guinier knee that is preceded by a power-law-like decay in intensity and is followed by a steep decay that deviates from Porod decay, similar to the behavior previously reported in the literature. , While it is common in SAS analysis to simply fit a power-law decay to this region and draw conclusions about the surface from the exponent, a distinct approach is adopted in this paper: the deviation from Porod decay is addressed first, followed by a comprehensive model that accounts for both the particle size and surface. To demonstrate the deviation from Porod scattering, the high- q portion of the TR-SAXS data was fit to the equation where the prefactor, B , and flat background, b , are varied to fit the intensity in the q -range: 0.12 Å –1 < q < 0.4 Å –1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In this mechanism, the DND particles immediately attach when they collide. Interestingly, the mass fractal dimensions, d, are slightly lower than those reported from DND colloids measured ex situ using small-angle neutron scattering 44,45 (SANS) and SAXS, 46 where values of d greater than 2 were found. To understand whether DLA may indeed be the mechanism responsible for the structures inferred from the experimental data, the time needed by a typical DND primary particle to diffuse over the average interparticle distance (L), τ = L 2 /D B , at the Chapman−Jouguet point (D B , primary particle diffusion constant) was estimated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Many models exist for small angle scattering from detonation nanodiamond and each has its advantages and limitations. In most cases, detonation nanodiamond is considered to be aggregated spherical particles with a surface that is not necessarily smooth nor well‐defined, as the high‐q scattering does not follow a perfect Porod decay . Here, the model accounts for the departure from Porod scattering by including surface texture, as it mimics the morphology observed by TEM imaging and has been proven to reproduce an accurate size distribution from the SAXS data .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%