We show that the upper bound for the central magnetic field of a super-Chandrasekhar white dwarf calculated by Nityananda and Konar [Phys. Rev. D 89, 103017 (2014)] and in the concerned comment, by the same authors, against our work [U. Das and B. Mukhopadhyay, Phys. Rev. D 86, 042001 (2012)] is erroneous. This in turn strengthens the argument in favor of the stability of the recently proposed magnetized super-Chandrasekhar white dwarfs. We also point out several other numerical errors in their work. Overall we conclude that the arguments put forth by Nityananda and Konar are misleading.Super-Chandrasekhar white dwarfs are currently in the limelight. This is, on one hand, due to the discovery of several peculiar, overluminous type la supemovae, e.g. SN 2006gz, SN 2007if, SN 2009dc, SN 2003fg [1-6], which seem to invoke the explosion of super-Chandrasekhar white dwarfs having mass 2.1-2.8MQ. This is all the more so, since Mukhopadhyay and his collaborators [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] initiated the explanation of such overluminous type la supemovae by proposing the existence of highly magnetized superChandrasekhar white dwarfs.Some authors [15,16] raised doubts regarding the stability of these super-Chandrasekhar white dwarfs, which, however, we have addressed and answered in detail in our latest works [13,14]. Some other authors, nevertheless, supported our work in their computations [17][18][19], In fact, Federbush et al. [19], by an extensive mathematical analysis, have shown the existence of stable magnetic star solutions, which include our super-Chandrasekhar white dwarfs [10]. Nityananda and Konar [20] have raised exactly the same question as the earlier critics [15,16], but have only stated it more circuitously, contributing nothing new in our view. A more serious concern, however, is that they [20] have presented erroneous results, which we correct in this article. Note that we use exactly the same symbols as in [20] for ease of comparison. Additionally, note that Nityananda and Konar [20] have used both Rt and R alternately to denote the stellar radius; however, in the present work we use only R to avoid confusion. We begin by stating that we have already solved the problem posed in Sec. IIA of [20] in our latest work [14]. In this work [14], by considering various magnetic field profdes, we have obtained stable magnetostatic equilibrium solutions of super-Chandrasekhar white dwarfs having mass as high as 3M0 in a general relativistic framework. Corresponding author. bm@physics.iisc.emet.in tupasana@physics.iisc.emet.in Next coming to Sec. IIB of [20], we note that although the formulas used in this section are correct, all the numerical estimates are incorrect. We point out that Table I of [20] lists incorrect values of Q(R9 m/R ) 4 corre sponding to different n. However, before we correct their table and comment accordingly, first we point out that even if one uses the incorrect values given in Table I of [20], then also one does not arrive at the maximum allowed central field SU pper-bound -1016 G, ...