2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2303.03150
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron star mass-radius constraints using the high-frequency QPOs of GRB 200415A

Abstract: Context. Quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) observed in a giant flare of a strongly magnetized neutron star (magnetar), are carrying crucial information for extracting the neutron star properties. Aims. The aim of the study is to constrain the mass and radius of the neutron star model for GRB 200415A, by identifying the observed QPOs with the crustal torsional oscillations together with the experimental constraints on the nuclear matter properties. Methods. The frequencies of the crustal torsional oscillations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11, for the neutron star model predicted with the empirical formula of ∆R Pb n , we only plot the stellar model whose central density is up to threefold the saturation density. In the same figure, we show the constraints on the neutron star mass and radius obtained from the various astronomical observations; the gravitational wave observations in the GW170817 event, i.e., the 1.4M neutron star radius is less than 13.6 km [8], whose constraint may become more severe by combining with the multimessenger observations and nuclear theory [71,72]; the x-ray observations via NICER for PSR J0030+0451 [16,17] and MSP J0740+6620 [18,19]; the observations of x-ray burst through the theoretical models [73]; and the identification of the magnetar quasi-periodic oscillations observed in GRB 200415A with the crustal torsional oscillations [74]. As the theoretical constraint, the top-left region can be excluded from the causality [75].…”
Section: Neutron Star Mass and Radius Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11, for the neutron star model predicted with the empirical formula of ∆R Pb n , we only plot the stellar model whose central density is up to threefold the saturation density. In the same figure, we show the constraints on the neutron star mass and radius obtained from the various astronomical observations; the gravitational wave observations in the GW170817 event, i.e., the 1.4M neutron star radius is less than 13.6 km [8], whose constraint may become more severe by combining with the multimessenger observations and nuclear theory [71,72]; the x-ray observations via NICER for PSR J0030+0451 [16,17] and MSP J0740+6620 [18,19]; the observations of x-ray burst through the theoretical models [73]; and the identification of the magnetar quasi-periodic oscillations observed in GRB 200415A with the crustal torsional oscillations [74]. As the theoretical constraint, the top-left region can be excluded from the causality [75].…”
Section: Neutron Star Mass and Radius Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%