2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.261104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron Star Equation of State in Light of GW190814

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
84
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
6
84
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the possibility for GW190814's secondary as a neutron star can be accomplished by: (1) choosing/constructing stiff EOSs having a maximum mass larger than 2.5 M [76,[141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150]; (2) considering the effects of fast rotations, which can increase the maximum mass by about 20% when a star rotates at the Kepler frequency (the maximum frequency at which the gravitational attraction is still sufficient to keep matter bound to the pulsar surface) [42,43,139,140,145,[151][152][153][154][155][156][157] ; (3) considering other effects/models that can modify the maximum mass of a neutron star, such as the magnetic field [147], twin star [158], two families of compact stars [142], finite temperature [153], antikaon condensation [159], net electric charge [144], etc.…”
Section: Is Gw190814's Secondary a Superfast And Supermassive Neutron Star Or Something Else?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the possibility for GW190814's secondary as a neutron star can be accomplished by: (1) choosing/constructing stiff EOSs having a maximum mass larger than 2.5 M [76,[141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150]; (2) considering the effects of fast rotations, which can increase the maximum mass by about 20% when a star rotates at the Kepler frequency (the maximum frequency at which the gravitational attraction is still sufficient to keep matter bound to the pulsar surface) [42,43,139,140,145,[151][152][153][154][155][156][157] ; (3) considering other effects/models that can modify the maximum mass of a neutron star, such as the magnetic field [147], twin star [158], two families of compact stars [142], finite temperature [153], antikaon condensation [159], net electric charge [144], etc.…”
Section: Is Gw190814's Secondary a Superfast And Supermassive Neutron Star Or Something Else?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tidal effects are quantified through the dimensionless tidal deformability Λ, which scales roughly as ðR=mÞ 6 [26] for a NS of mass m and radius R, implying that the most massive-and thus most compact-NSs exhibit inherently weaker tidal interactions. As an result, the very nature of some ∼2-3 M ⊙ compact objects observed with GWs, such as the primary in GW190425 [27] and the secondary in GW190814 [28], cannot be determined beyond a reasonable doubt [29][30][31][32][33][34]. In the same density regime as the GWs, the electromagnetic counterpart to GW170817 may bound the EoS stiffness from below [35][36][37][38], though it is subject to significant systematic modeling uncertainty [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we highlight the very recent observation of the GW190814 event, where a gravitational wave has been detected from the merger of a 22.2-24.3 M black hole with a non-identified compact object with mass 2.5-2.67 M [19,20]. Although the authors of the mentioned references suggest that is unlikely for the second component's mass to belong to a neutron star, they do leave open the window that the improved knowledge of the neutron star EoS and further observations of the astrophysical population of compact objects could alter this assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…By subtracting the component masses m 1 , m 2 in Equation ( 18), we obtain the corresponding values of M c . Then, since the masses are defined, from the Equations ( 19) and (20), the effective tidal deformability Λ can be determined.…”
Section: A Very Massive Neutron Star In a Binary Neutron Stars Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%