A computation of the cuprate phase diagram is presented. Adiabatic deformability back to the density function band structure plus symmetry constraints lead to a Fermi liquid theory with five interaction parameters. Two of these are forced to zero by experiment. The remaining three are fit to the moment of the antiferromagnetic state at half filling, the superconducting gap at optimal doping, and the maximum pseudogap. The latter is identified as orbital antiferromagnetism. Solution of the Hartree-Fock equations gives, in quantitative agreement with experiment, (1) quantum phase transitions at 5% and 16% p-type doping, (2) insulation below 5%, (3) a d-wave pseudogap quasiparticle spectrum, (4) pseudogap and superconducting gap values as a function of doping, (5) superconducting Tc versus doping, (6) London penetration depth versus doping, and (7) spin wave velocity. The fit points to superexchange mediated by the bonding O atom in the Cu-O plane as the causative agent of all three ordering phenomena.
I. INTRODUCTIONThe purpose of this paper is to discuss the theoretical phase diagram for the high-T c cuprate superconductors shown in Fig. 1 1-8 . It is generated using standard Hartree-Fock methods starting from a Fermi liquid theory with three interaction parameters 9-11 . It is characterized by three interpenetrating order parameters: spin antiferromagnetism, or spin density wave (SDW), d-wave superconductivity (DWS) and orbital current antiferromagnetism, or d-density wave (DDW) 12-14 .However, the central issue of the paper is not building better models for the cuprates but the application of elementary quantum mechanics to them. The equations that generate Fig. 1 are not just made up. They are the only equations one can write down that are compatible with adiabatic evolution out of a fictitious metallic parent, plus a handful of experimental fiducials. This evolution, which strictly enforces the Feynman rules, is the starting point of all conventional solid state physics. The ability of these equations to account broadly and well for all key aspects of high-T c phenomenology thus indicates that high-T c cuprates are not qualitatively different from other solids, as has often been suggested might be the case, but are simply materials with unusually complex low-energy spectroscopy. This complexity, which results from delicate interplay of multiple order parameters, has prevented the problem from being solved empirically. But elementary quantum mechanics so circumscribes the mathematics that one can say with confidence that the phase diagram in Fig. 1 is correct, even though one of its features, the identification of DDW with the cuprate pseudogap, is still in doubt phenomenologically [15][16][17][18][19] .The results reported in this paper therefore have significance far greater than simply accounting for the behavior of a particular class of materials. The 25-year history of the cuprates has demonstrated rather brutally that first-principles theoretical control of solids at the energy scales relevant to electron...