2017
DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.132.1704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron Resonances: Widths Distribution versus the Porter-Thomas Law

Abstract: The neutron resonance scattering off heavy nuclei is a paradigmatic example of the chaotic processes that are well described within the framework of the standard Random Matrix Theory (RMT). In zero approximation of non-overlapping resonances, the resonance width distribution is given by the standard Porter-Thomas law (PTD), where x = Γ / Γ is the resonance width measured in the units of its mean value. We analyze the influence of the resonance overlapping and show that the experimentally observed deviations fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, subsequent analyses [7,8] of the reduced neutron widths in the nuclear data ensemble seem to overturn the long held belief that it furnishes persuasive evidence for the applicability of the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble (GOE) of Hamiltonian matrices [9] in the description of CN fluctuation properties. There have been several attempts to reconcile these new findings with the standard statistical models of CN processes [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], but there is a consensus [23][24][25] that more data is needed to guide theoretical considerations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, subsequent analyses [7,8] of the reduced neutron widths in the nuclear data ensemble seem to overturn the long held belief that it furnishes persuasive evidence for the applicability of the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble (GOE) of Hamiltonian matrices [9] in the description of CN fluctuation properties. There have been several attempts to reconcile these new findings with the standard statistical models of CN processes [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], but there is a consensus [23][24][25] that more data is needed to guide theoretical considerations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%