2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.83.057304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron knockout ofBe12populating neutron-unbound states inBe11

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
19
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The validity of the values from set IV has already been questioned, due to the discrepancy in the angular shapes. The strong disagreement between sets III and IV is in contradiction with the result found in [25], where the two sets are claimed to provide consistent results. The spectroscopic factors for the excited states found by set III are consistent with the values found in [25].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The validity of the values from set IV has already been questioned, due to the discrepancy in the angular shapes. The strong disagreement between sets III and IV is in contradiction with the result found in [25], where the two sets are claimed to provide consistent results. The spectroscopic factors for the excited states found by set III are consistent with the values found in [25].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…The strong disagreement between sets III and IV is in contradiction with the result found in [25], where the two sets are claimed to provide consistent results. The spectroscopic factors for the excited states found by set III are consistent with the values found in [25]. For the excited 0 + 2 state the previous determination carried a large uncertainty since the 2 + 1 and the 0 + 2 states could not be separated in [25].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The best fit was achieved with a single resonance of decay energy 80 (2) In his Comment [1], Fortune discusses the possibility that the decay-energy spectrum of 11 Be from the original paper (Ref. [2]) could be described with contributions from two states at excitation energies of 3.887 and 3.955 MeV decaying to the 2 + excited state in 10 Be. This would correspond to decay energies of 18 and 86 keV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%