2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.102.014605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron-induced fission fragment angular distributions, anisotropy, and linear momentum transfer measured with the NIFFTE fission time projection chamber

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the simulation the detected angle was reconstructed as in the experiment, taking into account the angular and energy stragglings. In the simulation the angular distribution is always isotropic, and we checked at 100 MeV and 1 GeV that the computed average linear momentum transfer is in accordance with the NIFFTE results [49] and with [50], and allows us to test the boost effects.…”
Section: Angular Distribution Of Emitted Fragmentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the simulation the detected angle was reconstructed as in the experiment, taking into account the angular and energy stragglings. In the simulation the angular distribution is always isotropic, and we checked at 100 MeV and 1 GeV that the computed average linear momentum transfer is in accordance with the NIFFTE results [49] and with [50], and allows us to test the boost effects.…”
Section: Angular Distribution Of Emitted Fragmentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They are shown in Fig. 14(b) together with the results of other authors used catcher foil technique [17], proportional gas counters [16,34], semiconductors [35,36] and "track" detectors [37], as well as a gridded ionization fission chamber [38] and a time-projection chamber (TPC) [39,40].…”
Section: O U N T Smentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[40] lies below the total mass of experimental points available in the international library of experimental nuclear data EXFOR [41]. According to the authors of [40], this is due to the fact that all previously published data use a normalization at low incident neutron energies in order to determine the detection efficiency of their fission fragment detectors. However, no comparative analysis of the details of various experiments was given.…”
Section: O U N T Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The energy loss of the fission products in the target deposit and the carbon foil were calculated using the Northcliffe-Schilling tables and assuming that the fission event took place in the middle of target [29]. The linear momentum transfer (LMT) was parameterized using data from the 239 Pu(n,f) reaction and fit from E n = 7-120 MeV [30,31]. For E n < 7 MeV, LMT was assumed to be 100 %.…”
Section: F Phd and Fragment Energy Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%