Neutron Discrepancies in the DS86 Hiroshima Dosimetry System

Abstract

More than a decade has passed since a complete revision was initiated of the radiation doses received by survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings. The new dosimetry system (DS86) was completed in 1986 and adopted shortly thereafter. Overall, DS86 was noted to be a clear improvement over the old dosimetry system. However, based on limited validation measurements, troublesome inconsistencies were suggested for neutrons. Since 1986, a substantial number of additional neutron activation measurements have been made in mineral and metal samples from Hiroshima. Importantly, a large number of measurements have now been made at distances beyond 1 km. Here, inconsistencies between neutron activation measurements and DS86 calculations for Hiroshima are examined using all available measurement data, including new measurements for 36Cl which extend the measurement range to more than 1.7 km from the epicenter, and Monte Carlo modeling calculations for each sample measured. Results show that thermal neutron activation measured beyond approximately 1 km in Hiroshima (at distances most relevant for radiation-risk evaluation) is two to 10, or more, times higher than that calculated based on DS86. Similar trends observed when comparing results by several independent measurement laboratories, using different analytical methods, suggest that the DS86 calculations for low-energy neutrons are in error. Because of the importance of the Hiroshima data in radiation risk evaluation, this large discrepancy is in need of resolution.

Mapping the Distribution of 90Sr in Teeth with a Photostimulable Phosphor Imaging Detector

“…(18)] at distances from the hypocenter where people could survive, and these results were in close agreement with calculated values in the investigated samples. In addition, new measurements of thermal-neutron-induced 36 Cl also showed a reasonable agreement with the DS02 calculations (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), even at distances beyond 1,000 m from the hypocenter where previous studies found poor agreement with neutron transport calculations (25,26).…”

Curvilinearity in the dose-response curve for cancer in Japanese atomic bomb survivors.

“…Recently there have been indications of inconsistencies between the most current set of neutron dose estimates for the Hiroshima bomb survivors (dosimetry system 1986) and those measured by neutron activation in mineral and metal samples (19). It has been argued, however, that these dosimetric uncertainties imply only slight adjustments to the slopes of the cancer dose-response curves in the Japanese LSS cohort (20).…”

Radiation unlikely to be responsible for high cancer rates among distal Hiroshima A-bomb survivors

“…Historical concerns regarding possible flaws in the DS86 dosimetry system (e.g., [8]) led to the development of a new dosimetry system (DS02) [9]. DS02 was developed by a panel of international experts and includes improvements in the source terms, radiation transport, and shielding assessments, and has been validated by the results of extensive physical measurements.…”