2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2012.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron diffraction study of monoclinic brannerite-type CoV2O6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
43
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(23 reference statements)
7
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…19 This is however based on the assumption that all these interactions are antiferromagnetic, in contradiction with our results for J 4 . However, the weak amplitude of this interaction, close to the accuracy limit of our method, as well as the neglect of potentially large magnetoelastic coupling effects, 7,17 can reasonably justify the reassessment of J 4 to a weak antiferromagnetic value.…”
Section: Magnetic Ordermentioning
confidence: 58%
“…19 This is however based on the assumption that all these interactions are antiferromagnetic, in contradiction with our results for J 4 . However, the weak amplitude of this interaction, close to the accuracy limit of our method, as well as the neglect of potentially large magnetoelastic coupling effects, 7,17 can reasonably justify the reassessment of J 4 to a weak antiferromagnetic value.…”
Section: Magnetic Ordermentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The intrachain ordering (b axis) along edge-sharing CoO 6 octahedra is expected ferromagnetic (see ref 26) as usually observed for plethora of systems with similar topologies. 2,[16][17][18]23,29 The second propagation vector modulates the first one, tuning the orientation of the spin in a 8-fold unit cell. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that the magnetic saturation is not totally reached at the F plateau and could explain the slope of the magnetization curve above 1 T (Figure 2a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Although a propagation vector k = (1/2, 0, 0) was found, characterizing standard AF and F moment configurations along the a and c axes, respectively, there is no strong proof that the order inside the chains (i.e., along the b axis) is ferromagnetic as this was the case for the α phase. 16,18 Moreover, many magnetic satellite peaks could not be indexed. 8 The authors have therefore suggested the existence of incommensurate modulated magnetic structures related to the existence of the two different Co sites, as this was evidenced in other frustrated systems such as Ca 3 Co 2 O 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7(d)] and the reversal of magnetization proceeds via 1 3 -magnetization steps; ↑↑↑→↑↓↑→↓↓↓→↓↑↓→↑↑↑ as magnetic field is cycled up → down → up. Two models for the ↑↓↑ 1 3 -magnetization phase are plausible-an order of 2↑:1↓-spin chains parallel to the c axis, as observed in some frustrated triangular lattices such as CoV 2 O 6 , [22][23][24] or an ↑↓↑ order of successive Nd planes perpendicular to c. High-field neutron diffraction will be needed to distinguish between these possibilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%